Graduating otolaryngology resident preparedness for fellowship as assessed by fellowship faculty

The purpose of this study was to evaluate fellowship program directors' perceptions of incoming clinical fellows' preparedness for subspecialty training and to thereby identify strengths and shortcomings in otolaryngology training programs' ability to prepare residents for fellowship.

Validated e-mail survey.

Two hundred eleven otolaryngology subspecialty fellowship program directors and faculty directly involved with training fellows were contacted. A validated survey by the American College of Surgeons was modified and distributed to otolaryngology fellowship faculty in six otolaryngology subspecialties. The 59-item survey employed a five-response Likert scale tailored to each subspecialty. Responses were collected between November 2016 and January 2017.

One hundred ten otolaryngology faculty responded to the survey (52%). Respondents had worked with fellows for a mean of 12 years (standard deviation = 8). Respondents felt fellows were competent in the areas of professionalism, clinical evaluation, and management. Pediatric faculty were more likely to disagree about fellows' independence in the operating room (P = .004) and during call (P = .002) compared to other specialties. Laryngology and facial plastic and reconstructive surgery faculty felt more neutral about anatomy recognition (P = .008), tissue manipulation (P = .002), and use of energy sources (e.g., cautery, lasers) (P < .001). Fellows in all subspecialties were felt to be least prepared in research and academic interest.

Faculty involved in fellowship training feel that fellows are well-prepared overall upon entering fellowship. Residency programs may benefit from providing more experience with facial plastic reconstructive surgery, laryngology, and pediatrics. Regardless of specialty, residents could benefit from increased training in research design, data analysis, and basic statistics.

NA Laryngoscope, E280-E286, 2018.