Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 16, 2026

Catheter Ablation in Combination With Left Atrial Appendage Closure for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: February 26, 2013
Structured care of patients with atrial fibrillation improves guideline adherence
Neshro Barmano1,2,3, Ulla Walfridsson2,2, Håkan Walfridsson3,3
1Department of Internal Medicine, County hospital Ryhov, Jönköping, Sweden.
Insights
Structured care for atrial fibrillation (AF) patients significantly improves guideline adherence and reduces symptoms. This approach enhances health-related quality of life (HRQoL) compared to standard care.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Public Health
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Atrial fibrillation (AF) negatively impacts patient health-related quality of life (HRQoL).
- Guideline adherence in AF treatment is often suboptimal.
- Standard care may not adequately address AF management complexities.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare structured care versus standard care for general AF populations.
- To evaluate the impact on guideline adherence.
- To assess effects on HRQoL, symptoms, anxiety, and depression.
Main Methods:
- 176 patients in intervention (structured care) and 146 in control (standard care) groups.
- Intervention involved a structured follow-up program.
- Primary outcome: guideline adherence (OAC, antiarrhythmics, tests), PROMs (SF-36, EQ-5D, HADS, ASTA) at baseline and 1 year.
Main Results:
- Significantly better guideline adherence in the intervention group (91% vs. 63%, p < 0.01), driven by appropriate oral anticoagulant (OAC) use (94% vs. 74%, p < 0.01).
- Fewer symptoms and reduced negative impact of AF in the intervention group post-intervention.
- Improvements in SF-36 scales and EQ-5D visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS) observed in both groups.
Conclusions:
- Structured care significantly enhances guideline adherence for AF patients.
- Patients receiving structured care reported fewer symptoms and improved disease-specific HRQoL.
- Structured care represents an improvement over standard care for managing AF.
Aims:
There are many reports of lack of guideline adherence in the treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), and AF affects health-related quality of life (HRQoL) negatively. The aim of this study was to investigate whether structured care compared to standard care of a general AF population could improve guideline adherence and HRQoL, and reduce symptoms,anxiety and depression.
Methods:
In total, 176 patients were recruited to the intervention and 146 patients to the control group.The intervention consisted of a structured follow-up program, while patients serving as controls received standard care. The primary outcome was guideline adherence evaluated through: appropriate use of oral anticoagulants (OAC) and antiarrhythmics, whether echocardiogram and thyroid lab tests were performed, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), assessed with the questionnaires SF-36, EQ-5D, HADS and ASTA at baseline and after one year.
Results:
Guideline adherence was significantly better in the intervention group, 91% vs. 63% (p < 0.01), mainly due to appropriate OAC treatment 94% vs. 74% (p < 0.01). Symptoms assessed with ASTA were less frequent and the negative impact of AF was reduced in the intervention group after one year/ at follow-up. Five scales in SF-36, and the visual analogue scale for current health status in EQ-5D (EQ-VAS), improved significantly in both groups.
Conclusion:
Structured care of patients with AF significantly improved guideline adherence and patients reported fewer symptoms and a reduced negative impact on disease-specific HRQoL compared to standard care at one year follow-up.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Dysrhythmias VI: Management of Dysrhythmias
Dysrhythmias VII: Nursing Management of Dysrhythmias
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome V: Nursing Management

