Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Factors Influencing Attraction III: Similarity01:23

Factors Influencing Attraction III: Similarity

830
The similarity hypothesis suggests that individuals are more likely to form relationships with others who share similar attitudes, beliefs, values, and interests. This concept has been widely studied in social psychology, demonstrating that perceived similarity fosters interpersonal attraction. In an experiment supporting this hypothesis, participants were presented with fabricated information indicating that strangers held attitudes similar to their own. The results showed that participants...
830
Factors Influencing Attraction II: Physical Attraction01:21

Factors Influencing Attraction II: Physical Attraction

277
Physical attractiveness plays a crucial role in shaping interpersonal attraction, influencing first impressions, social interactions, and long-term relationship dynamics. Psychological research consistently demonstrates that attractiveness affects social evaluations and behavioral outcomes in various contexts.Influence on Social InteractionsResearch has shown that individuals perceived as physically attractive often experience preferential treatment in social and professional settings. One...
277
Relationship Formation02:12

Relationship Formation

46.3K
What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
46.3K
Facial Feedback Hypothesis01:24

Facial Feedback Hypothesis

689
Charles Darwin proposed that facial expressions are an evolutionary adaptation for communication. He argued that these expressions are not influenced by culture but are universal across species. For example, a snarling expression with exposed teeth signals a threat in many animals, including humans. Darwin also suggested that displaying an emotion can intensify the feeling. Smiling, for example, could enhance one's sense of happiness. This idea laid the foundation for understanding the role...
689
Desirable Characteristics in Others01:26

Desirable Characteristics in Others

131
Various factors, including the type of relationship, gender, and duration of the relationship, influence the perception of desirable characteristics in others. While certain traits such as trustworthiness, cooperativeness, agreeableness, and extraversion are universally valued across all relationships, other characteristics are context-dependent and gain prominence based on specific relational dynamics.Universal and Context-Dependent TraitsTrustworthiness and cooperativeness are fundamental...
131
Implicit Personality Theories01:23

Implicit Personality Theories

469
Implicit personality theory explains how individuals make assumptions about the relationships between personality traits, behaviors, and character types. When people learn that someone possesses a particular trait, they tend to infer the presence of other related characteristics, forming a cohesive impression. This cognitive shortcut plays a crucial role in social interactions and interpersonal judgments.Central Traits and Their InfluenceSolomon Asch's seminal 1946 study highlighted the power...
469

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Training humans to detect AI-generated faces.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Time, space and feature similarity determine attractive and repulsive serial biases in trustworthiness impressions.

BMC biology·2026
Same author

Introducing the Naturalistic Expression Labeling Task (NELT): Associations with posed expression labeling, empathy, and general cognitive ability.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same author

Too good to be true: Synthetic AI faces are more average than real faces and super-recognizers know it.

British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953)·2026
Same author

Early Emergence of Spontaneous Trait Content in Children's Unconstrained Impressions of Faces.

Developmental science·2026
Same author

Testing stimulus generalisation as a mechanism for impression formation.

Cognition·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 16, 2026

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
07:34

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

18.0K

Facial first impressions and partner preference models: Comparable or distinct underlying structures?

Jennifer K South Palomares1,2, Clare A M Sutherland1,3, Andrew W Young1

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of York, Heslington, UK.

British Journal of Psychology (London, England : 1953)
|December 19, 2017
PubMed
Summary

Facial first impressions align with verbal partner preference models. This suggests that how we perceive faces relates to our stated preferences in romantic relationships.

Keywords:
face perceptionfirst impressionsperson perceptionromantic relationshipssocial inferences

More Related Videos

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

3.0K
Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
09:49

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Published on: December 24, 2015

14.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 16, 2026

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
07:34

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

18.0K
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

3.0K
Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
09:49

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Published on: December 24, 2015

14.6K

Area of Science:

  • Social Psychology
  • Evolutionary Psychology
  • Computer Vision

Background:

  • Online dating is prevalent, making facial first impressions crucial for relationship initiation.
  • Understanding how facial impressions relate to stated partner preferences is important.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To test if a verbal partner preference model applies to facial impressions from real images.
  • To explore the structure of facial first impressions related to partner preference traits.

Main Methods:

  • Participants rated 1,000 face photographs on 12 traits from a verbal partner preference model.
  • Analyzed the factor structure of facial trait judgments.

Main Results:

  • Facial trait judgments mirrored the tripartite structure of the verbal preference model.
  • This structure held true regardless of participant or face gender.
  • A strong correspondence was found between verbal partner preference models and general facial impression models.

Conclusions:

  • Facial first impressions possess a structure consistent with verbal models of romantic preferences.
  • There is an underlying link between how we verbally express preferences and how we visually assess potential partners.