Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Observational Learning01:12

Observational Learning

1.0K
Albert Bandura's observational learning, also known as imitation or modeling, occurs when a person observes and imitates another's behavior. It is a quicker process than operant conditioning. A well-known example is the Bobo doll study, where children who saw an adult acting aggressively towards the doll were more likely to act aggressively when left alone, compared to those who observed a nonaggressive adult. Many psychologists view observational learning as a form of latent learning...
1.0K
Time-Domain Interpretation of PD Control01:07

Time-Domain Interpretation of PD Control

412
Proportional-Derivative (PD) control is a widely used control method in various engineering systems to enhance stability and performance. In a system with only proportional control, common issues include high maximum overshoot and oscillation, observed in both the error signal and its rate of change. This behavior can be divided into three distinct phases: initial overshoot, subsequent undershoot, and gradual stabilization.
Consider the example of control of motor torque. Initially, a positive...
412
Hierarchy of Motor Control01:18

Hierarchy of Motor Control

6.4K
The hierarchy of motor control refers to the different levels of organization and processing involved in controlling movement in the body. These levels range from higher cortical areas involved in planning and decision-making to lower spinal cord reflexes that respond automatically to external stimuli.
6.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Simons Collaboration on Ecological Neuroscience: Studying how the brain interacts with the world.

Neuron·2026
Same author

The organization of multiple motor memories.

Current opinion in neurobiology·2026
Same author

Rapid responses to reach errors are equally strong during fixation and visual pursuit.

Journal of neurophysiology·2026
Same author

Comparison of IOS and Body Plethysmography Findings in Patients with Interstitial Lung Disease.

Tanaffos·2026
Same author

Adaptive integration of model-based and model-free strategies in human reinforcement learning of reachable space.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Dynamic nanoscale architecture of synaptic vesicle fusion in mouse hippocampal neurons.

Nature communications·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 16, 2026

WheelCon: A Wheel Control-Based Gaming Platform for Studying Human Sensorimotor Control
08:18

WheelCon: A Wheel Control-Based Gaming Platform for Studying Human Sensorimotor Control

Published on: August 15, 2020

5.5K

An error-tuned model for sensorimotor learning.

James N Ingram1, Mohsen Sadeghi1, J Randall Flanagan2

  • 1Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Trumpington Street, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

Plos Computational Biology
|December 19, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a new modular architecture for sensorimotor control, where motor commands combine fixed primitives. Module selection uses context and error signals, improving motor learning and adaptation.

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Unveiling Neural Mechanisms Through Automated Evaluation of Motor Learning and Myelin Plasticity Studies Using the Erasmus Ladder
08:51

Author Spotlight: Unveiling Neural Mechanisms Through Automated Evaluation of Motor Learning and Myelin Plasticity Studies Using the Erasmus Ladder

Published on: December 15, 2023

2.1K
A Fully Automated Rodent Conditioning Protocol for Sensorimotor Integration and Cognitive Control Experiments
09:43

A Fully Automated Rodent Conditioning Protocol for Sensorimotor Integration and Cognitive Control Experiments

Published on: April 15, 2014

11.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 16, 2026

WheelCon: A Wheel Control-Based Gaming Platform for Studying Human Sensorimotor Control
08:18

WheelCon: A Wheel Control-Based Gaming Platform for Studying Human Sensorimotor Control

Published on: August 15, 2020

5.5K
Author Spotlight: Unveiling Neural Mechanisms Through Automated Evaluation of Motor Learning and Myelin Plasticity Studies Using the Erasmus Ladder
08:51

Author Spotlight: Unveiling Neural Mechanisms Through Automated Evaluation of Motor Learning and Myelin Plasticity Studies Using the Erasmus Ladder

Published on: December 15, 2023

2.1K
A Fully Automated Rodent Conditioning Protocol for Sensorimotor Integration and Cognitive Control Experiments
09:43

A Fully Automated Rodent Conditioning Protocol for Sensorimotor Integration and Cognitive Control Experiments

Published on: April 15, 2014

11.1K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Robotics
  • Motor Control

Background:

  • Current sensorimotor control models involve combining multiple modules for motor commands.
  • Understanding module selection and adaptation mechanisms is crucial for sensorimotor control.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a novel modular architecture for multi-dimensional sensorimotor tasks.
  • To investigate how top-down contextual and bottom-up error information influence module selection and adaptation.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a modular architecture with fixed primitives compensating for single-direction errors.
  • Implemented top-down module selection via Gaussian tuning to visual context (object orientation).
  • Applied bottom-up adaptation where module contribution scales with error reduction (cosine tuning to error direction).

Main Results:

  • The model successfully predicted that interference occurs only with opposing kinematic errors, not orthogonal ones.
  • Experimental validation confirmed that kinematic errors alone can engage appropriate modules without visual context.
  • The model accurately accounted for existing experimental data on sensorimotor learning.

Conclusions:

  • Sensorimotor control and learning involve two interacting processes for module selection.
  • Top-down contextual cues and bottom-up error-driven adaptation are key mechanisms.
  • This framework offers a robust explanation for adaptive motor behavior.