Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Preventive Healthcare Services01:30

Preventive Healthcare Services

2.2K
Preventive healthcare services keep people healthy via frequent check-ups, screening, and counseling. They primarily aid in disease prevention rather than treating an acute or chronic illness. Preventive treatment also keeps individuals productive and energetic, allowing them to work well into their retirement years. Examples of preventive care services include:
2.2K
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

488
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
488
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

447
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
447
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures01:26

Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures

737
Effective preventive measures for coronary artery disease (CAD) focus on controlling modifiable risk factors, including cholesterol abnormalities and lifestyle changes.Cholesterol ManagementFirst, the Mediterranean diet and the American Heart Association advocate for maintaining low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels below 100 mg/dL, with a more stringent recommendation of below 70 mg/dL for individuals at high risk. LDL cholesterol, often termed "bad cholesterol," can lead to the...
737
Levels of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention01:26

Levels of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention

15.0K
Health promotion allows a person to control the determinants of health, resulting in an improved health status. It enhances the quality of life and reduces premature deaths. Health promotion and illness prevention programs help people make beneficial choices to reduce the risk of disease and disabilities. There are three health promotion and illness prevention levels: primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention.
In primary prevention, actions taken before disease onset prevent the disease from...
15.0K
Relative Risk01:12

Relative Risk

2.2K
Relative risk (RR) is a statistical measure commonly used in epidemiology to compare the likelihood of a particular event occurring between two groups. This metric is important for evaluating the relationship between exposure to a specific risk factor and the probability of a particular outcome. It plays a crucial role in medical research, public health studies, and risk assessment. Relative risk quantifies how much more (or less) likely an event is to occur in an exposed group compared to an...
2.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Whole Health, Whole Communities - Dialogues to Reduce Rural Health Disparities.

NEJM catalyst innovations in care delivery·2026
Same author

Invisible staffing churn in nursing homes: CMS turnover metrics miss a growing short-term workforce.

Health affairs scholar·2026
Same author

Nasal steroids, irrigation, oral antibiotics, and subgroup targeting for effective management of acute sinusitis (NOSES): Protocol for a comparative effectiveness randomized controlled trial.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Implementing High-Quality Primary Care in 2025: Key Policy Priorities.

NAM perspectives·2026
Same author

Measuring Primary Care Capacity: Unique Patients Seen per Year and Implications for Workforce Shortages.

Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM·2026
Same author

Patient, community, and clinician beliefs about multi-cancer detection tests: implications for the evidence needed to recommend routine use.

Journal of public health (Oxford, England)·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 16, 2026

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
07:31

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack

Published on: May 15, 2020

8.2K

Framework for Using Risk Stratification to Improve Clinical Preventive Service Guidelines.

Jennifer S Lin1, Corinne V Evans1, David C Grossman2

  • 1Kaiser Permanente Research Affiliates Evidence-based Practice Center, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente, Portland, Oregon.

American Journal of Preventive Medicine
|December 20, 2017
PubMed
Summary

Guidelines for preventive services should consider population-specific benefits and harms. A new framework helps determine when and how to stratify recommendations based on individual risk factors for better clinical decision-making.

More Related Videos

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

13.6K
Hydra, a Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Cardiovascular Analysis and Diagnosis
07:51

Hydra, a Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Cardiovascular Analysis and Diagnosis

Published on: September 26, 2018

8.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 16, 2026

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
07:31

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack

Published on: May 15, 2020

8.2K
A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

13.6K
Hydra, a Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Cardiovascular Analysis and Diagnosis
07:51

Hydra, a Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Cardiovascular Analysis and Diagnosis

Published on: September 26, 2018

8.1K

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Preventive Services
  • Health Services Research
  • Evidence-Based Medicine

Background:

  • Preventive services require balancing benefits against harms, which can differ across populations.
  • Stratifying guidelines by population risk is crucial for effective clinical recommendations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a conceptual approach and practical tools for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.
  • To guide decisions on incorporating risk stratification into clinical preventive service guidelines.

Main Methods:

  • A six-question algorithm was developed to systematically assess the need for risk stratification.
  • The algorithm considers clinically relevant subpopulations, credible subgroup analyses, and differences in net benefit.

Main Results:

  • The framework facilitates a systematic approach to incorporating population-specific evidence.
  • It promotes consistent critical thinking and transparent communication regarding risk-stratified recommendations.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed algorithm provides a structured method for determining when and how to apply risk stratification in preventive service guidelines.
  • This approach enhances the precision and applicability of clinical recommendations across diverse populations.