Dual direction CRISPR transcriptional regulation screening uncovers gene networks driving drug resistance

Carlos le Sage1, Steffen Lawo1, Prince Panicker1

  • 1Horizon Discovery, 8100 Cambridge Research Park, Waterbeach, Cambridge, CB25 9TL, United Kingdom.

Scientific Reports
|December 20, 2017
PubMed

Insights

Pooled CRISPR screens identify drug targets by combining knockout, interference, and activation methods. This approach enhances confidence in identifying genes influencing drug response and resistance.

Area of Science:

  • * CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing technologies
  • * Cancer drug discovery and resistance mechanisms

Background:

  • * Pooled CRISPR-Cas9 knockout (CRISPRko) screens are effective for drug target identification but can yield false positives from multiple DNA cleavages.
  • * Nuclease-deficient Cas9 variants enable CRISPR interference (CRISPRi) for gene repression and CRISPR activation (CRISPRa) for gene overexpression.
  • * Combining CRISPRko, CRISPRi, and CRISPRa offers a more comprehensive approach to functional genomics.

Purpose of the Study:

  • * To directly combine CRISPRko, CRISPRi, and CRISPRa in genome-wide screens.
  • * To identify genetic components influencing sensitivity and resistance to the BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib.
  • * To reveal complex gene networks controlling drug response through integrated functional genomics.

Main Methods:

  • * Genome-wide CRISPRko, CRISPRi, and CRISPRa screens were performed.
  • * The screens were designed to identify genetic modifiers of vemurafenib response.
  • * Loss-of-function (CRISPRko, CRISPRi) and gain-of-function (CRISPRa) datasets were integrated.

Main Results:

  • * The combined application of CRISPRko, CRISPRi, and CRISPRa identified key regulators of vemurafenib response.
  • * Integration of loss- and gain-of-function data revealed complex gene networks underlying drug sensitivity and resistance.
  • * This multi-pronged CRISPR approach enhances confidence in novel drug target identification and validation.

Conclusions:

  • * Directly combining CRISPRko, CRISPRi, and CRISPRa in genome-wide screens is feasible and powerful.
  • * This integrated approach provides a more robust method for identifying drug targets and understanding drug resistance.
  • * The study highlights the value of combining diverse CRISPR-based functional genomics strategies for drug discovery.

Related Concept Videos

Genetic Screens02:46

Genetic Screens

Genetic screens are tools used to identify genes and mutations responsible for phenotypes of interest. Genetic screens help identify individuals or a group of people at risk of developing  genetic diseases and help them with early intervention, targeted therapy, and reproductive options.
Forward genetic screens
Forward or “classical” genetic screens involve creating random mutations in an organism’s DNA using radiation, mutagens, or insertion of additional bases, which...
5.8K
Pharmacogenomics: Identification of New Drug Targets01:29

Pharmacogenomics: Identification of New Drug Targets

Advances in genomics have profoundly influenced drug discovery by increasing both the speed and accuracy of pharmaceutical development. Pharmacogenomics, which examines how genetic variation influences drug response, facilitates the identification of novel therapeutic targets and enables patient stratification for personalized treatment. These strategies contribute to improved drug efficacy, minimized adverse effects, and more efficient clinical trial design.Mapping genetic differences...
9
Treatment Resistant Cancers02:56

Treatment Resistant Cancers

Cancer is the second leading cause of death in the United States. A cancer cell is genetically unstable and hence can mutate faster. They can also modify their microenvironment and escape immune surveillance. The difficulties in treating cancer are further compounded by the emergence of rapid resistance to anticancer drugs. The most common ways to attain resistance in cancer cells include alteration in drug transport and metabolism, modification of drug target, elevated DNA damage response, or...
3.8K