Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 16, 2026

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
Published on: August 29, 2025
Proposal for a Five-Step Method to Elicit Expert Judgment
Duco Veen1, Diederick Stoel2, Mariëlle Zondervan-Zwijnenburg1
1Department of Methods and Statistics, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
This study introduces a Five-Step Method for expert knowledge elicitation, improving probabilistic representations. The method uses feedback to refine expert beliefs, enhancing statistical analysis and Bayesian frameworks.
Area of Science:
- Psychological Research
- Statistical Analysis
- Bayesian Frameworks
Background:
- Expert knowledge elicitation is crucial for statistical analysis.
- Directly obtaining distributional representations from experts is often unsatisfactory.
- Feedback mechanisms can improve the quality of expert elicitation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To propose a novel Five-Step Method for expert knowledge elicitation.
- To decompose the elicitation process into smaller, manageable steps with feedback.
- To represent expert tacit knowledge and uncertainty using probabilistic parameters.
Main Methods:
- The Five-Step Method involves iterative elicitation and feedback.
- Location, scale, and shape parameters are elicited sequentially.
- Interactive software facilitates feedback and adjustment of expert input.
- User feasibility and internal validity were assessed through three studies.
Main Results:
- The Five-Step Method allows experts to refine their probabilistic representations.
- Feedback enhances the accuracy and reliability of elicited expert knowledge.
- The method is feasible and internally valid for practical application.
Conclusions:
- The proposed Five-Step Method offers a structured approach to expert elicitation.
- This method improves the incorporation of expert prior knowledge in statistical analyses.
- It provides a robust way to calibrate probability distributions and assess prior-data conflict.
Related Concept Videos
Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic
Ethical Dilemmas II
Data Validation
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
Eyewitness Memory
One such error is memory distortion, which occurs because human memory does not function...

