Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

621
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
621
Study Design in Statistics01:15

Study Design in Statistics

10.1K
A study design is a set of techniques that allow a researcher to collect and analyze data from different variables defined for a specific research problem. Statistics is commonly for effective study design and more robust experiments,
Does aspirin reduce the risk of heart attacks? Is one brand of fertilizer more effective at growing roses than another? Is fatigue as dangerous to a driver as the influence of alcohol? Questions like these are answered using randomized experiments with proper...
10.1K
Longitudinal Studies01:26

Longitudinal Studies

540
Longitudinal studies are also widely used in other medical and social science fields. For instance, in cardiovascular research, they can monitor patients' health over decades to identify risk factors for heart disease, such as high cholesterol or smoking, and evaluate the long-term effectiveness of preventive measures. Similarly, in mental health studies, researchers might follow individuals from adolescence into adulthood to understand the development and progression of conditions like...
540
Crossover Experiments01:16

Crossover Experiments

4.6K
Crossover experiments, also called the repeated-measurements design, is a study design in which all experimental units are exposed to all treatments in different periods. Crossover experiments are generally used in psychology, the pharmaceutical industry, agriculture, and medicine.
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
4.6K
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

447
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
447
Study Designs in Epidemiology01:20

Study Designs in Epidemiology

1.1K
Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
1.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

DATA-ADAPTIVE EFFICIENT ESTIMATION STRATEGIES FOR BIOMARKER STUDIES EMBEDDED IN RANDOMIZED TRIALS.

The annals of applied statistics·2026
Same author

The interplay between loneliness, cortisol, and NK cell function: The role of cortisol in NK cell dysfunction.

Psychoneuroendocrinology·2026
Same author

NHLBI Workshop Panel Discussion: Summary of the Workshop.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same author

Sensitivity Analyses for Missing in Repeatedly Measured Outcome Data.

Statistics in medicine·2025
Same author

Mediating Pathways Between Neighborhood Structural Investment and Cardiometabolic Health Across U.S. Cities.

American journal of preventive medicine·2025
Same author

Hierarchical Analysis of Composite Time-to-Event End Points in Heart Failure Clinical Trials Using Time in Clinical State.

Circulation. Heart failure·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 16, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

15.4K

Detecting treatment differences in group sequential longitudinal studies with covariate adjustment.

Neal O Jeffries1, James F Troendle1, Nancy L Geller1

  • 1Office of Biostatistics Research, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, U.S.A.

Biometrics
|December 22, 2017
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces new methods for analyzing longitudinal studies to detect treatment differences at any follow-up time. It extends previous group sequential testing by incorporating generalized estimating equations and covariates.

Keywords:
Generalized estimating equationsGeneralized linear modelsGroup sequential designLongitudinal analysis

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

1.2K
The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 16, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

15.4K
Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

1.2K
The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.4K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trials
  • Longitudinal Data Analysis

Background:

  • Longitudinal studies often compare treatment efficacy over time.
  • Detecting treatment differences at any point, especially with non-monotone effects, is challenging.
  • Existing group sequential methods may not fully address adaptive follow-up time selection.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To extend methods for identifying treatment differences in longitudinal studies with adaptive follow-up.
  • To test the intersection null hypothesis of no difference at any time point.
  • To develop procedures accounting for multiplicity in follow-up times and interim analyses.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized generalized estimating equations (GEE) for broader data modeling.
  • Incorporated covariates into the analysis of treatment effects.
  • Developed testing procedures for adaptive selection of follow-up times with treatment differences.

Main Results:

  • Extended Jeffries and Geller (2015) methods to a wider range of data.
  • Demonstrated the inclusion of covariates using GEE.
  • Proposed methods to identify specific follow-up times with treatment differences while controlling for multiplicity.

Conclusions:

  • The developed methods enhance the ability to detect treatment differences in longitudinal studies.
  • The approach accounts for complex treatment effects over time and interim analyses.
  • This provides a more robust framework for clinical trial design and analysis.