Scores TISS-28 versus NEMS to size the nursing team in a pediatric intensive care unit

Kelly Dayane Stochero Velozo1, Pedro Celiny Ramos Garcia1, Jefferson Pedro Piva2

  • 1Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.

Insights

The Nursing Activities Score (NEMS) indicated higher nursing workload and team size needs in pediatric intensive care compared to the Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System (TISS-28). Both scales showed good agreement for workload assessment.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Intensive Care Nursing
  • Healthcare Management
  • Nursing Workload Measurement

Background:

  • Accurate estimation of nursing workload and appropriate team sizing are critical for patient safety and quality of care in pediatric intensive care units (PICUs).
  • Existing tools require validation for specific clinical settings to ensure optimal resource allocation.
  • The Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System-28 (TISS-28) and the Nine Equivalents of Nursing Manpower (NEMS) are commonly used but their comparative performance in PICUs needs further investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To estimate nursing workload and determine optimal nursing team size in a PICU setting.
  • To compare the efficacy of the TISS-28 and NEMS scoring systems in assessing nursing workload and team sizing.
  • To evaluate the correlation and agreement between TISS-28 and NEMS in a pediatric intensive care environment.

Main Methods:

  • An observational prospective quantitative study conducted in a university hospital's PICU over one year (2009).
  • Inclusion criteria: children hospitalized for >8 hours (or >4 hours if deceased).
  • Data collected included clinical information, Paediatric Index of Mortality 2, TISS-28, and NEMS scores, which were converted to nursing working hours and team size recommendations.

Main Results:

  • A total of 459 children and 3,409 observations were analyzed.
  • Average TISS-28 score was 20.8±8, and NEMS score was 25.2±8.7.
  • NEMS estimated a higher nursing workload (13.3 hours) and required a larger team (35.8 professionals) compared to TISS-28 (11 hours, 29.6 professionals), with adequate correlation and agreement between the instruments.

Conclusions:

  • The NEMS provides a significantly higher estimation of nursing time spent on activities and required team size compared to the TISS-28 in a PICU.
  • These findings suggest NEMS may offer a more comprehensive assessment for nursing resource allocation in pediatric intensive care.
  • Both TISS-28 and NEMS demonstrated acceptable correlation and agreement, supporting their utility in workload assessment.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos