Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 16, 2026

Quantification of Mouse Heart Left Ventricular Function, Myocardial Strain, and Hemodynamic Forces by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Published on: May 24, 2021
Effects of contrast administration on cardiac MRI volumetric, flow and pulse wave velocity quantification using
Amir Fathi1, Jonathan R Weir-McCall1, Allan D Struthers1
11 Division of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Medical Research Institute, University of Dundee , Dundee , UK.
Insights
Gadolinium contrast agents impact left ventricular (LV) measurements but not right ventricular (RV) or pulse wave velocity (PWV) analysis. These effects are amplified with automated cardiac MRI techniques.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Imaging
- Medical Physics
- Radiology
Background:
- Cardiac MRI is crucial for cardiovascular assessment.
- Gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) enhance image quality but may affect quantitative analysis.
- Understanding GBCA effects on cardiac MRI metrics is vital for accurate interpretation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of gadolinium contrast agent on cardiac MRI quantification.
- To compare the effects across manual, semi-automatic, and fully automatic analysis techniques.
- To assess the robustness of left ventricular (LV), right ventricular (RV), aortic flow, and pulse wave velocity (PWV) measurements.
Main Methods:
- 61 healthy participants underwent cardiac MRI at 3T.
- Phase contrast imaging of the aorta was performed pre- and post-gadolinium administration.
- Ventricular volumes and aortic flow were analyzed using manual, semi-automatic, and fully automatic methods.
Main Results:
- Gadolinium contrast significantly increased signal-to-noise ratio.
- LV end-systolic volume increased and ejection fraction decreased post-contrast (p<0.05).
- RV analysis, aortic flow, and PWV showed no significant changes, with minor differences observed in automated techniques.
Conclusions:
- Gadolinium contrast alters LV endocardial contour detection, particularly with automated analysis.
- RV volumetric quantification, aortic flow, and PWV measurements are robust to gadolinium contrast.
- While LV quantification is affected, the clinical significance of these small changes requires further investigation.
Objective:
The aim of the current study was to determine the effects of gadolinium contrast agent on right (RV) and left ventricular (LV) volumetric, aortic flow and pulse wave velocity (PWV) quantification using manual, semi-automatic and fully automatic analysis techniques.
Methods:
61 participants free from known cardiovascular disease were recruited. Cardiac MR was performed on a 3 T scanner. A balanced steady-state free precession stack was acquired of the ventricles with phase contrast imaging of the aorta performed pre- and post-administration of 10 ml 0.5 mmol ml-1 gadoterate meglumine. The images were analysed manually, and using a semi-automated and a fully automated technique.
Results:
54 completed the study. Gadolinium-based contrast administration significantly increase the signal-to-noise ratio (pre: 830 ± 398 vs post: 1028 ± 540, p = 0.003) with no significant change in contrast-to-noise ratio (pre: 583 ± 302 vs post: 559 ± 346, p = 0.54). On LV analysis, post-contrast analysis yielded significantly higher end systolic volume (54 ± 20 vs 57 ± 18 ml, p = 0.04), and lower ejection fraction (59 ± 9 vs 57 ± 8%, p = 0.023). On RV analysis, gadolinium contrast resulted in no significant differences. Similar results were seen using the semi-automated and fully-automated techniques but with a larger magnitude of difference. Conversely, using both manual and software analysis aortic flow and PWV quantification proved robust to the effects of contrast agent producing only small non-significant differences.
Conclusion:
Gadolinium contrast administration significantly alters LV endocardial contour detection with this effect amplified when using semi-automated analysis techniques. In comparison, RV and PWV analysis is robust to these effects. Advances in knowledge: Contrast administration alters LV quantification but not flow analysis. However, these differences are small.
More Related Videos
08:35Oxygenation-sensitive Cardiac MRI with Vasoactive Breathing Maneuvers for the Non-invasive Assessment of Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction
Published on: August 17, 2022
11:16In vitro Assessment of Aortic Regurgitation Using Four-Dimensional Flow Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Published on: February 25, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System IV: CMRI
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System II:Types of Echocardiography
Types of Echocardiography
Transthoracic Echocardiography (TTE)
TTE is the most common type of echocardiogram which involves placing a transducer on the patient's chest, emitting sound waves to create heart images. TTE is invaluable for evaluating the heart's size, structure, and motion, making it particularly useful for...