Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 16, 2026

Visually Sexing Loggerhead Shrike Lanius Ludovicianus Using Plumage Coloration and Pattern
Published on: March 8, 2020
Factors affecting availability for detection: An example using radio-collared Northern Bobwhite (Colinus virginianus)
Christopher M Lituma1, David A Buehler1, Evan P Tanner1
1Department of Forestry, Wildlife and Fisheries, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, United States of America.
Bird call surveys can underestimate Northern Bobwhite populations. Increased conspecific calling significantly boosts individual detection probability, especially in longer surveys. Account for this to avoid biased population estimates.
Area of Science:
- Wildlife Ecology
- Ornithology
- Bioacoustics
Background:
- Avian monitoring often relies on vocalizations, but individual detection is influenced by social cues.
- The impact of conspecific calling on Northern Bobwhite (Colinus virginianus) detection probability is not well quantified.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess how behavioral and temporal factors influence Northern Bobwhite breeding season detection availability.
- To evaluate detection probability across different survey durations (3, 5, and 10 minutes).
Main Methods:
- Radio-collared male Northern Bobwhites were monitored during 10-minute surveys.
- Vocalizations (singing rate, number of other calling males), time since sunrise, and day of season were recorded.
- Logistic regression modeled individual availability for detection and singing behavior.
Main Results:
- Individual detection availability increased significantly with the number of other calling Northern Bobwhites.
- Detection availability was 30-100% higher in 10-minute surveys compared to 3- or 5-minute surveys.
- Northern Bobwhites called more frequently and at higher rates when stimulated by other calling individuals.
Conclusions:
- Survey duration and conspecific vocalizations are critical factors affecting Northern Bobwhite detection probability.
- Failure to account for these factors can lead to underestimation of population sizes, particularly in low-density populations.
- Adjusting monitoring protocols to incorporate these findings is essential for accurate avian population assessment.
Related Concept Videos
Conservation of Declining Populations
Mate Choice
Frequency-dependent Selection
Background and Environment Affect Phenotype
An example of how genetic background affects phenotype can be seen in horses. The Extension gene in horses is responsible for their coat color. A wild-type gene (EE) produces black pigment in the coat, while a mutant gene (ee) produces red pigment. A...
Testing a Claim about Mean: Unknown Population SD
Estimating a population mean requires the samples to be approximately normally distributed. The data should be collected from the randomly selected samples having no sampling bias. There is no specific requirement for sample size. But if the sample size is less than 30, and we don't know the population standard deviation, a different approach is used;...
Complementation Tests
Organisms heterozygous for different mutations are crossed pairwise in all combinations. If present on different genes, the mutations can complement each other by providing the missing...

