Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 16, 2026

Electrospinning Growth Factor Releasing Microspheres into Fibrous Scaffolds
Published on: August 16, 2014
In vivo release of peptide-loaded PLGA microspheres assessed through deconvolution coupled with mechanistic approach
Ivana Tomic1, Martin Mueller-Zsigmondy2, Ana Vidis-Millward2
1Novartis Pharma AG, Technical Research and Development, CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland; University of Auvergne, Department of Biopharmacy, EA 4678, 63001 Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Abstract:
In this study, a reevaluation of the in vivo release phases from long-release PLGA-based microspheres is presented, leading to a better characterization of the plasma concentrations/time profile. Microspheres were designed for intramuscular injection releasing a cyclic somatostatin analog over 70 days. Clinical study was performed in 64 healthy subjects receiving a subcutaneous dose of an immediate release solution as reference formulation and an intramuscular injection of microspheres as test formulation. The in vivo input curve was obtained by numerical deconvolution. Results showed that double Weibull function could not fit correctly the tri-phasic (burst, lag, and erosion) in vivo input profile typical for PLGA-based formulations, due to a change in the drug release trend in the terminal phase. Triple Weibull showed a significant improvement in the curve fitting, each term being assigned to one of the following phases: initial (burst/lag), erosion, and terminal phase of drug release. The existence of the additional terminal phase was confirmed by a mechanistic approach as well, which denoted that this phase was, most probably, a consequence of the release mechanism change from erosion to diffusion controlled. The same model demonstrated that the burst release was as well influenced by the polymer swelling, while currently existing theories state that the burst phase is mainly determined by the dissolution of immediately available drug substance and diffusion through surface related pores.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Deconvolution
Deconvolution involves several mathematical techniques to derive the impulse response. One common approach is polynomial division. In this method, the input and output sequences are treated as coefficients of...
Peptide Bonds
G-protein Coupled Receptors
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the involved orbitals. The...
Mechanistic Models: Overview of Compartment Models

