Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Evaluation of a quadtree-based compression algorithm with digitized urograms.

E J Halpern1, J H Newhouse, E S Amis

  • 1Department of Radiology, Columbia Presbyterian Medical Center, New York, NY 10032.

Radiology
|April 1, 1989
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Acute Gouty Knee Arthritis: Ultrasound Findings Compared With Dual-Energy CT Findings.

AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2018
Same author

Management-changing errors in the recall of radiologic results - a pilot study.

Clinical radiology·2012
Same author

An intelligent control strategy for computer consultation.

IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence·2011
Same author

[Ultrasound contrast agents and prostate cancer].

Der Radiologe·2005
Same author

Vascular damage induced by type 2 diabetes mellitus as a risk factor for benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Diabetologia·2005
Same author

[The value of ultrasound (US) in the diagnosis of prostate cancer].

Der Radiologe·2003

Quadtree data compression for digitized radiographs can impact diagnostic accuracy. Compression ratios of 11:1 or higher may reduce sensitivity for detecting findings, especially calcifications.

Area of Science:

  • Radiology
  • Medical Imaging
  • Data Compression

Background:

  • Digitized radiographs are increasingly used in diagnostics.
  • Data compression is essential for efficient storage and transmission of medical images.
  • The impact of compression algorithms on diagnostic yield requires careful evaluation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the effect of a quadtree-based data-compression algorithm on the diagnostic yield of digitized urograms.
  • To determine the optimal compression ratios that maintain diagnostic accuracy.

Main Methods:

  • 100 digitized urograms were reviewed at varying compression ratios (90:1 to 4.2:1).
  • Four radiologists independently assessed images against a reference standard of 201 findings.
  • Sensitivity and false-positive rates were calculated at each compression level.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Sensitivity decreased significantly at compression ratios of 11:1 and higher.
  • No loss of sensitivity was observed at a 4.2:1 compression ratio.
  • Calcifications showed a greater sensitivity decrease than soft-tissue masses; false-positive rates remained unaffected.

Conclusions:

  • Quadtree compression ratios of 11:1 and above may compromise diagnostic sensitivity in digitized radiographs.
  • Lower compression ratios, such as 4.2:1, appear safe for maintaining diagnostic yield.
  • Careful consideration of compression levels is necessary to balance image file size and diagnostic accuracy.