Interaction of Sb(III) with iron sulfide under anoxic conditions: Similarities and differences compared to As(III)...

This study examined the reaction mechanism of arsenite, As(III), and antimonite, Sb(III), with iron sulfide and compared their pH-dependent reaction behaviors under strictly anoxic environments. The comparison of Sb(III) with As(III), based on their chemical similarity, may provide useful insight into understanding the geochemical behavior of the less studied Sb(III). The pH-dependent batch sorption studies revealed that As(III) and Sb(III) displayed similar removal trends with pH in terms of the removal efficiency. However, the aqueous As(III) species transformed to thioarsenite species, while aqueous Sb(III) species remained inert under the highly sulfidic anoxic system. An X-ray absorption spectroscopy study demonstrated the reaction of As(III) and Sb(III) at acidic pH was closely related to the precipitation of sulfide minerals As₂S₃ and Sb₂S₃, respectively, as a consequence of the reaction with sulfide produced through mackinawite dissolution. Meanwhile, the removal at basic pH was inferred as a surface reaction, possibly through surface complexation, surface-precipitation, or both. In this study, the pH-dependent Sb(III) uptake mechanisms proved to be similar to the corresponding mechanisms for As(III) uptake, with mackinawite demonstrating a superior capacity to scavenge Sb(III) in ferrous and sulfide-rich reducing environments.