Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 16, 2026

Ocular Kinematics Measured by In Vitro Stimulation of the Cranial Nerves in the Turtle
Published on: June 2, 2018
Still slow, but even steadier: an update on the evolution of turtle cranial disparity interpolating shapes along
Christian Foth1,2, Eduardo Ascarrunz1, Walter G Joyce1
1Departement für Geowissenschaften, Universität Freiburg, 1700 Freiburg, Switzerland.
Abstract:
In a previous study, we estimated the cranial disparity of turtles (Testudinata) through time using geometric morphometric data from both terminal taxa and hypothetical ancestors to compensate for temporal gaps in the fossil record. While this method yielded reasonable results for the Mesozoic and the early Cenozoic, we found a large drop in cranial disparity for the Miocene, for which we found no correlation with known environmental changes or extinction events. Instead, we speculated that the Miocene dip was a result of poor sampling of fossils or ancestors in this time bin. To countervail this problem, we here updated our original dataset and interpolated changes of shape along the branch lengths and compared them with the previous data. We furthermore explored the impact of topological and temporal uncertainty, demonstrating that the Miocene dip, indeed, is a sampling artefact. All remaining conclusions of the previous study could be more or less supported, nevertheless, including an apparent correlation with global biogeographic events, a minor correlation between cranial disparity and global temperature, and resilience across the K/T extinction event.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?
Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?
In contrast, regions which code...
The Evidence for Evolution
Convergent Evolution
Reconstruction of Signal using Interpolation
Eukaryotic Evolution
Contrary to the endosymbiont theory, the eukaryote-first hypothesis proposes that the simpler prokaryotic and...

