Safety of Synthetic Glue Used for Laparoscopic Prolapse Treatment

We detected mesh erosion and serious postoperative complications in 3 women after performing laparoscopic promontofixation (LPF) using glue for mesh fixation. Glue, largely used in hernia surgery repair, is proposed by some gynecologic surgeons because it saves time and is easier to use than traditional sutures. We report 3 cases of postoperative complications after LPF in which glue had been used and provide research in the published literature about the use of glue in LPF.

A research of glue use in gynecology mesh fixation was performed through PubMed on October 2016. The search was done using the Medical Subject Heading terms "POP" & "Laparoscopy" & "surgical Mesh" and the word either "glue" or "adhesive. Only 2 articles were found: Willecocq et al [1] and Estrade et al [2]. Neither study focused on postoperative complications. In this publication, we accurately edited video surgeries with an instructive purpose.

University Hospital of Clermont-Ferrand, France.

Patient A, a 65-year-old woman, complained of pelvic pain and vaginal discharge 1 month after LPF (polypropylene mesh and glue had been used). Wall mesh exposure and purulent discharge were noted. She received antibiotics and underwent mesh ablation surgery; debris of the glue was easily identified. Patient B, a 65-year-old lady with previous hysterectomy consulted for a bulging feeling in her vagina (classification: cystocele +2; rectocele +3 stage). An LPF was performed using polypropylene soft nonabsorbable mesh and glue. One month later, an apical defect of vaginal epithelialization was detected; she received long estrogenic local treatment but had to undergo surgery when presenting malodorous discharge and mesh exposure. The exposed mesh was removed, and pieces of glue were identified, having avoided mesh attachment. Patient C had a previous abdominal hysterectomy and promontofixation using a polyester mesh with glue. She consulted to us for vaginal mesh erosion covered with purulent discharge 3.5 years after LPF in another center. At the surgery, 1 cm of the prosthesis was identified in the vagina, dissected, and sutured. One year later, she consulted for dyspareunia and purulent discharge; vaginal rigid mesh exposure with an epithelization defect and inflammatory signs was seen. During laparoscopy, prosthetic exposition and glue debris on the prosthesis were identified.

In all 3 cases, debris of glue were identified in the no integrated mesh area. The suggested reasons of exposure can be the excessive amount of surgical glue applied. Moreover, a large amount of glue may be impairing tissue ingrowth through the mesh pores, causing low fibrosis and poor tissue integration [3].

Glue seems to prevent fibrosis from occurring. Its use in pelvic organ prolapse laparoscopic mesh fixation should be done with caution. No prospective studies reporting long-term comorbidities and results have been published.