Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 16, 2026

Semi-Automated Planimetric Quantification of Dental Plaque Using an Intraoral Fluorescence Camera
Published on: January 27, 2023
Digital Intraoral Imaging Re-Exposure Rates of Dental Students
Anthea Senior1, Curtis Winand2, Seema Ganatra2
1Dr. Senior is Associate Chair, DDS Clinical Education, and Clinical Associate Professor, School of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta; Dr. Winand was a DDS student, School of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta; Dr. Ganatra is Clinical Professor, School of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta; Dr. Lai is Associate Professor and Director of Assessment and Evaluation, School of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta; Dr. Alsulfyani, a Diplomate ABOMR, is Assistant Professor, Oral Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud University and Adjunct Professor, School of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta; and Dr. Pachêco-Pereira is Clinical Assistant Professor, School of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Alberta. senior@ualberta.ca.
Abstract:
A guiding principle of radiation safety is ensuring that radiation dosage is as low as possible while yielding the necessary diagnostic information. Intraoral images taken with conventional dental film have a higher re-exposure rate when taken by dental students compared to experienced staff. The aim of this study was to examine the prevalence of and reasons for re-exposure of digital intraoral images taken by third- and fourth-year dental students in a dental school clinic. At one dental school in Canada, the total number of intraoral images taken by third- and fourth-year dental students, re-exposures, and error descriptions were extracted from patient clinical records for an eight-month period (September 2015 to April 2016). The data were categorized to distinguish between digital images taken with solid-state sensors or photostimulable phosphor plates (PSP). The results showed that 9,397 intraoral images were made, and 1,064 required re-exposure. The most common error requiring re-exposure for bitewing images was an error in placement of the receptor too far mesially or distally (29% for sensors and 18% for PSP). The most common error requiring re-exposure for periapical images was inadequate capture of the periapical area (37% for sensors and 6% for PSP). A retake rate of 11% was calculated, and the common technique errors causing image deficiencies were identified. Educational intervention can now be specifically designed to reduce the retake rate and radiation dose for future patients.
Related Concept Videos
Student t Distribution
The Student t distribution was developed by William S. Goset (1876–1937) of the...
Microsoft Excel: Student's t-Test
To conduct a t-test in Excel, use the T.TEST function or the "Data...
Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test
Reaction Rate
The mathematical representation of the change in the concentration of reactants and products, over time, is the rate...
Related Rates
Speciation Rates

