Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 16, 2026

Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making
Published on: March 2, 2011
Understanding Gender Differences in Rape Victim Blaming: The Power of Social Influence and Just World Beliefs
Caitlin M Pinciotti1, Holly K Orcutt1
1Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, USA.
Abstract:
Victims of sexual violence are frequently blamed by friends, family, or legal personnel in the aftermath of an attack, with men attributing greater blame on average than women. Victims' experiences of being blamed may generate a vicious cycle in which they are more likely to be blamed in the future. Moreover, just world beliefs (JWB) have been studied extensively as an underlying cognitive mechanism that predicts greater blame. Studies examining the influence of social support on blame have yet to examine the unique role of JWB on these attributions. The current study examined blame attribution of a fictional rape victim who received either positive, negative, or neutral support from friends and family in a sample of 383 undergraduate men and women. Individually, social support and JWB were both significant predictors of blame, and women were more influenced by social support than men; specifically, gender was a more salient predictor of blame toward the positively supported victim, suggesting that positive support received by friends and family may evoke a domino effect of support from other women. Conditional effects revealed that JWB were most influential on blame when responding to the positively supported victim. Implications and suggestions for future research are discussed.
Related Concept Videos
Social Scripts
Factors Influencing Attraction V: Social Skills
Social Proof
The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison
Social Loafing
Causes of Social Behavior III: Biological and Environmental Influences

