Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 16, 2026

Identifying PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors with Surface Plasmon Resonance Technology
Published on: May 2, 2025
PD-L1 inhibitors in the pipeline: Promise and progress
Vito Vanella1, Lucia Festino1, Martina Strudel1
1Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Innovative Therapies Unit - Istituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione "G. Pascale," Napoli, Italy.
Abstract:
Checkpoint inhibitors have improved survival for patients with melanoma, non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), bladder, head and neck and other cancers. Antibodies against PD-L1, including atezolizumab, avelumab and durvalumab, are also being developed and have been approved for various cancers. Compared with anti-CTLA-4 drugs, studies with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents have suggested higher response rates and improved survival. Targeting PD-L1 rather than PD-1 may also theoretically offer further benefit, with the potential for improved efficacy and reduced toxicity, although this has not been clearly shown by clinical experience to date. Anti-PD-L1 agents have shown good efficacy and manageable toxicity in several tumor types.
Insights
Checkpoint inhibitors, like PD-L1 antibodies, improve survival in various cancers. Targeting PD-L1 shows promise for enhanced efficacy and reduced toxicity in cancer treatment.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Immunotherapy
Background:
- Checkpoint inhibitors have transformed cancer treatment, improving survival rates for patients with melanoma, non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), bladder, head and neck cancers.
- Antibodies targeting Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1), such as atezolizumab, avelumab, and durvalumab, are approved for treating various malignancies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the efficacy and safety of anti-PD-L1 agents in cancer therapy.
- To compare the benefits of targeting PD-L1 versus PD-1.
Main Methods:
- Review of clinical studies and data on anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents.
- Comparative analysis of anti-PD-L1 drugs against anti-CTLA-4 therapies.
Main Results:
- Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents demonstrate higher response rates and improved survival compared to anti-CTLA-4 drugs.
- Anti-PD-L1 agents exhibit good efficacy and manageable toxicity across several tumor types.
Conclusions:
- Targeting PD-L1 may offer theoretical advantages in efficacy and toxicity over PD-1 inhibition.
- Anti-PD-L1 therapies represent a significant advancement in immuno-oncology, with broad applicability in cancer treatment.
More Related Videos
07:43Using 22C3 Anti-PD-L1 Antibody Concentrate on Biopsy and Cytology Samples from Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients
Published on: September 25, 2018
10:18Author Spotlight: Magnetic Fluorescent Bead-Based Dual-Reporter Flow Analysis of PDL1-Vaxx Peptide Vaccine-Induced Antibody Blockade of the PD-1/PD-L1 Interaction
Published on: July 7, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Eukaryotic Transcription Inhibitors
Eukaryotic transcription inhibitors usually contain two distinct domains, a...
PD Controller: Design
Designing a continuous-data controller requires selecting and linking components like adders and integrators, which are fundamental in Proportional,...
Time-Domain Interpretation of PD Control
Consider the example of control of motor torque. Initially, a positive...
Tumor Progression
Colon cancer is one of the best-documented examples of tumor progression. Early mutation in the APC gene in colon cells causes a small growth on the colon wall called a polyp. With time, this polyp grows into a benign, pre-cancerous tumor. Further...
Frequency-Domain Interpretation of PD Control
The proportional control gain, combined with the...
mTOR Signaling and Cancer Progression
The mTOR pathway or the...