Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 16, 2026

Mapping RNA-RNA Interactions Globally Using Biotinylated Psoralen
Published on: May 24, 2017
Mapping of global scientific research in comorbidity and multimorbidity: A cross-sectional analysis
Ferrán Catalá-López1,2,3, Adolfo Alonso-Arroyo4,5, Matthew J Page6
1Department of Medicine, University of Valencia/INCLIVA Health Research Institute and CIBERSAM, Valencia, Spain.
Insights
Scientific research on comorbidity and multimorbidity is rapidly expanding globally. The United States leads this research, with significant contributions from Western countries, highlighting the growing importance of managing complex health conditions.
Area of Science:
- Bibliometrics and Scientometrics
- Health Services Research
- Epidemiology
Background:
- Comorbidity and multimorbidity present significant challenges to global health services.
- Existing analysis of scientific research in these areas is limited.
- Understanding the landscape of comorbidity and multimorbidity research is crucial for advancing healthcare.
Purpose of the Study:
- To map the global scientific research output on comorbidity and multimorbidity.
- To analyze the maturity and growth trends of this research area over recent decades.
- To identify key contributors, publications, and research themes.
Main Methods:
- Cross-sectional bibliometric analysis of the Web of Science database (up to November 2016).
- Inclusion of research articles and reviews without language or date restrictions.
- Descriptive and network analyses of publication trends, prolific authors, countries, journals, and keyword co-occurrence.
Main Results:
- 85,994 papers published between 1970 and 2016, with 64% in 2010-2016.
- Psychiatry, surgery, clinical neurology, and general/internal medicine were the leading specialties.
- The United States led global productivity, followed by the UK, Germany, and Canada.
- Highly cited papers focused on methodological tools (e.g., Charlson Comorbidity Index) and chronic disease epidemiology.
Conclusions:
- This study represents the first comprehensive analysis of global scientific research on comorbidity and multimorbidity.
- Scientific production in this field is experiencing worldwide growth.
- Western countries, particularly the United States, demonstrate leadership in this research domain.
Background:
The management of comorbidity and multimorbidity poses major challenges to health services around the world. Analysis of scientific research in comorbidity and multimorbidity is limited in the biomedical literature. This study aimed to map global scientific research in comorbidity and multimorbidity to understand the maturity and growth of the area during the past decades.
Methods And Findings:
This was a cross-sectional analysis of the Web of Science. Searches were run from inception until November 8, 2016. We included research articles or reviews with no restrictions by language or publication date. Data abstraction was done by one researcher. A process of standardization was conducted by two researchers to unify different terms and grammatical variants and to remove typographical, transcription, and/or indexing errors. All potential discrepancies were resolved via discussion. Descriptive analyses were conducted (including the number of papers, citations, signatures, most prolific authors, countries, journals and keywords). Network analyses of collaborations between countries and co-words were presented. During the period 1970-2016, 85994 papers (64.0% in 2010-2016) were published in 3500 journals. There was wide diversity in the specialty of the journals, with psychiatry (16558 papers; 19.3%), surgery (9570 papers; 11.1%), clinical neurology (9275 papers; 10.8%), and general and internal medicine (7622 papers; 8.9%) the most common. PLOS One (1223 papers; 1.4%), the Journal of Affective Disorders (1154 papers; 1.3%), the Journal of Clinical Psychiatry (727 papers; 0.8%), the Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (634 papers; 0.7%) and Obesity Surgery (588 papers; 0.7%) published the largest number of papers. 168 countries were involved in the production of papers. The global productivity ranking was headed by the United States (37624 papers), followed by the United Kingdom (7355 papers), Germany (6899 papers) and Canada (5706 papers). Twenty authors who published 100 or more papers were identified; the most prolific authors were affiliated with Harvard Medical School, State University of New York Upstate Medical University, National Taiwan Normal University and China Medical University. The 50 most cited papers ("citation classics" with at least 1000 citations) were published in 20 journals, led by JAMA Psychiatry (11 papers) and JAMA (10 papers). The most cited papers provided contributions focusing on methodological aspects (e.g. Charlson Comorbidity Index, Elixhauser Comorbidity Index, APACHE prognostic system), but also important studies on chronic diseases (e.g. epidemiology of mental disorders and its correlates by the U.S. National Comorbidity Survey, Fried's frailty phenotype or the management of obesity).
Conclusions:
Ours is the first analysis of global scientific research in comorbidity and multimorbidity. Scientific production in the field is increasing worldwide with research leadership of Western countries, most notably, the United States.
More Related Videos
08:57Quantification of Optic Nerve Cross Sectional Area on MRI: A Novel Protocol using Fiji Software
Published on: September 4, 2021
05:57A Rapid Automated Protocol for Muscle Fiber Population Analysis in Rat Muscle Cross Sections Using Myosin Heavy Chain Immunohistochemistry
Published on: March 28, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Cross-Sectional Research
The Scientific Method
The Scientific Method
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
The Scientific Method
Finding Volume Using Cross-Sectional Area
Profile Leveling and Cross Sections