Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

11.8K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
11.8K
Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean01:25

Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean

9.0K
A point estimate of the population mean is obtained from a single sample. Such a point estimate does not represent a population well because it needs to account for variability in the population. Single point estimate can also be biased despite the sample being selected randomly. Thus, a point estimate is often unreliable. A confidence interval is needed to reduce this unreliability.
A confidence interval for the mean is a range of values that provides an estimate of the population mean. As the...
9.0K
Distributions to Estimate Population Parameter01:26

Distributions to Estimate Population Parameter

5.2K
The accurate values of population parameters such as population proportion, population mean, and population standard deviation (or variance) are usually unknown. These are fixed values that can only be estimated from the data collected from the samples. The estimates of each of these parameters are sample proportion, the sample mean, and sample standard deviation (or variance). To obtain the values of these sample statistics, data are required that have particular distribution and central...
5.2K
The Uncertainty Principle04:08

The Uncertainty Principle

33.2K
Werner Heisenberg considered the limits of how accurately one can measure properties of an electron or other microscopic particles. He determined that there is a fundamental limit to how accurately one can measure both a particle’s position and its momentum simultaneously. The more accurate the measurement of the momentum of a particle is known, the less accurate the position at that time is known and vice versa. This is what is now called the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. He...
33.2K
Alternative Sets of Equilibrium Equations01:31

Alternative Sets of Equilibrium Equations

1.1K
When analyzing the behavior of structures, engineers often rely on the concept of equilibrium. This refers to the state where all forces and moments acting on a system balance each other, resulting in no net movement or rotation. In many cases, equilibrium can be described by a set of standard equations. However, in some situations, alternative sets of equilibrium equations must be used to describe the system's behavior accurately.
One example of such a situation can be observed in a...
1.1K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments02:46

Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments

54.2K
Counting is the type of measurement that is free from uncertainty, provided the number of objects being counted does not change during the process. Such measurements result in exact numbers. By counting the eggs in a carton, for instance, one can determine exactly how many eggs are there in the carton. Similarly, the numbers of defined quantities are also exact. For example, 1 foot is exactly 12 inches, 1 inch is exactly 2.54 centimeters, and 1 gram is exactly 0.001 kilograms. Quantities...
54.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Adventitious Error and Its Implications for Testing Relations Between Variables and for Composite Measurement Outcomes.

Psychometrika·2026
Same author

What does a <i>Z</i>-curve analysis tell us?

Cognition & emotion·2026
Same author

Depression and anxiety mediate the relationship between COVID-19 stay-at-home orders and tobacco and marijuana use.

PloS one·2025
Same author

Understanding measurement precision from a regression perspective.

Psychological methods·2025
Same author

On Zero-Count Correction Strategies in Tetrachoric Correlation Estimation.

Multivariate behavioral research·2025
Same author

On a general theoretical framework of reliability.

The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 16, 2026

Setting Limits on Supersymmetry Using Simplified Models
07:46

Setting Limits on Supersymmetry Using Simplified Models

Published on: November 15, 2013

9.0K

Parameter uncertainty in structural equation models: Confidence sets and fungible estimates.

Jolynn Pek1, Hao Wu2

  • 1Department of Psychology, The Ohio State University.

Psychological Methods
|January 5, 2018
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces confidence sets (CSs) and fungible parameter estimates (FPEs) to enhance the dependability of psychological findings. These methods offer crucial insights into parameter uncertainty, strengthening scientific conclusions.

More Related Videos

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements
10:22

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements

Published on: September 7, 2019

8.8K
Parameterizing V-notch Weir Equations for Flow Monitoring in a Drainage Control Structure
07:15

Parameterizing V-notch Weir Equations for Flow Monitoring in a Drainage Control Structure

Published on: April 25, 2025

1.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 16, 2026

Setting Limits on Supersymmetry Using Simplified Models
07:46

Setting Limits on Supersymmetry Using Simplified Models

Published on: November 15, 2013

9.0K
Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements
10:22

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements

Published on: September 7, 2019

8.8K
Parameterizing V-notch Weir Equations for Flow Monitoring in a Drainage Control Structure
07:15

Parameterizing V-notch Weir Equations for Flow Monitoring in a Drainage Control Structure

Published on: April 25, 2025

1.1K

Area of Science:

  • Psychological research methodology
  • Statistical modeling in social sciences

Background:

  • Concerns about the reliability of psychological findings necessitate methodological advancements.
  • Parameter uncertainty is critical for evaluating the defensibility of scientific conclusions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the importance of confidence sets (CSs) and fungible parameter estimates (FPEs) in assessing scientific findings.
  • To introduce a unified perturbation framework for understanding CSs and FPEs.
  • To demonstrate how CSs and FPEs provide unique information for robust scientific interpretation.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a general perturbation framework based on the likelihood function within structural equation modeling.
  • Illustrating conceptual distinctions and differential influences on CSs and FPEs.
  • Application of CSs and FPEs to empirical examples using OpenMx code.

Main Results:

  • The perturbation framework unifies CSs and FPEs, clarifying their theoretical differences.
  • Empirical examples demonstrate that CSs and FPEs offer distinct, valuable information.
  • CSs and FPEs contribute to more informed scientific conclusions by quantifying parameter uncertainty.

Conclusions:

  • Considering information from CSs and FPEs strengthens the interpretation of statistical results in psychological research.
  • Methodological developments like CSs and FPEs are vital for dependable scientific conclusions.
  • Future research should explore further applications and implications of these uncertainty measures.