Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 16, 2026

Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale
Published on: August 25, 2014
Why Suicide Risk Assessment Still Matters
Hal S Wortzel1, Sarra Nazem, Nazanin H Bahraini
1WORTZEL: Michael K. Cooper Professor of Neurocognitive Disease, Director of Neuropsychiatry, and Associate Professor in Psychiatry, Neurology, and Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Faculty for the Forensic Psychiatry Fellowship at the University of Colorado, Denver, CO; Director of Neuropsychiatric Services for the Rocky Mountain MIRECC at the Denver VA, Denver, CO NAZEM: Clinical research psychologist with the Rocky Mountain MIRECC and Assistant Professor in the Departments of Psychiatry and Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation at the University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, CO BAHRAINI: Director of Education for the Rocky Mountain MIRECC and Associate Professor in the Departments of Psychiatry and Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation at the University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, CO MATARAZZO: Director of Clinical Services for the Rocky Mountain MIRECC and Assistant Professor in the Department of Psychiatry at the University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, CO.
Despite increased suicide prevention efforts, suicide rates remain stable. This analysis argues that suicide risk assessment remains valuable in patient-centered mental health care, enhancing recovery beyond prediction.
Area of Science:
- Psychiatry
- Public Health
- Mental Health Care
Background:
- Recent years have seen increased public awareness and professional efforts in suicide prevention.
- Despite these efforts, suicide rates have remained relatively stable over the past decade.
- This has led to skepticism regarding the effectiveness of suicide risk assessment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To present arguments against the utility of suicide risk assessment.
- To offer a counter-argument for the continued importance of suicide risk assessment.
- To explore the role of suicide risk assessment within patient-centered mental health care.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing data and arguments concerning suicide risk assessment.
- Presentation of a clinical perspective on the value of suicide risk assessment.
- Discussion of the integration of suicide risk assessment into therapeutic care.
Main Results:
- Data suggests suicide rates have not significantly decreased despite increased prevention efforts.
- Arguments exist questioning the predictive accuracy and clinical utility of suicide risk assessment.
- Suicide risk assessment, when integrated with patient-centered care, offers therapeutic benefits independent of predictive accuracy.
Conclusions:
- The effectiveness of suicide risk assessment is debated due to stable suicide rates.
- Suicide risk assessment remains a crucial component of comprehensive mental health care.
- Integrating suicide risk assessment into patient-centered care enhances therapeutic outcomes and recovery.
Related Concept Videos
Classifying Matter by State
Classifying Matter by Composition
According to its composition, the matter can be classified into two broad categories — pure substances and mixtures.
A pure substance is a form of matter that has a constant composition throughout with uniform properties. For example, any sample of sucrose has the same composition and same physical properties, such as melting point, color, and sweetness, regardless of the source from which it is isolated.
A mixture is composed of two or...
Physical and Chemical Properties of Matter
What is Matter?
The Atomic Theory of Matter
States of Matter
Scientists have discovered a fourth state of matter, plasma, that occurs naturally in the interiors...

