Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 15, 2026

Investigating the Pathogenesis of MYH7 Mutation Gly823Glu in Familial Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy using a Mouse Model
Published on: August 8, 2022
Cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with end-stage hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
Ammar M Killu1, Jae-Yoon Park1, Jaskanwal D Sara1
1Department of Cardiovascular Diseases.
Insights
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) did not improve ventricular function in patients with end-stage hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). However, CRT did not worsen heart function, though advanced therapies were still common.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
- Heart Failure Management
Background:
- Dilated/end-stage hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a recognized but rare clinical entity.
- The efficacy of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in this specific patient population with reduced ejection fraction has not been previously investigated.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of bi-ventricular pacing via CRT on ventricular function and clinical outcomes in patients with dilated/end-stage HCM.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of the Mayo Clinic HCM database.
- Identification of 9 patients with HCM and ejection fraction (EF) <50% who received CRT, matched with 1:1 controls.
- Clinical outcomes, including left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation, cardiac transplant, or death, were assessed.
Main Results:
- CRT did not significantly improve ejection fraction at 6-month, 12-month, or long-term follow-up compared to baseline (34.7% ± 7.1% at implant).
- There was no significant difference in the combined endpoint of LVAD, cardiac transplant, or death between the CRT and control groups (P=0.90).
- In the CRT group, 89% were alive at last follow-up (mean 12.9 years), with 3 LVADs and 2 transplants; in the control group, 44.4% were alive (mean 12.0 years), with 1 LVAD and 1 transplant.
Conclusions:
- Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) does not appear to offer a significant benefit in improving ventricular function in patients with dilated/end-stage HCM.
- While CRT did not lead to further deterioration of left ventricular function in the medium term, advanced heart failure therapies remained a common necessity in this cohort.
Aims:
A dilated/end-stage phase of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is rare but well-recognized. The role for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in this subset of patients remains unexplored. We aimed to clarify the impact of bi-ventricular pacing CRT in dilated/end-stage HCM.
Methods And Results:
The Mayo Clinic HCM database was interrogated to identify patients with ejection fraction (EF) <50% and CRT. Control subjects were identified in 1:1 manner. Clinical outcomes were determined. Of 2073 patients with HCM, 9 (8 male) had EF <50% and received CRT. The average age at CRT-D implant was 44.8 ± 14.8 years, an average of 17.3 ± 10.3 years after HCM diagnosis. The indication for CRT was based on New York Heart Association class ≥II symptoms (mean 2.7 ± 0.4) and EF <50% in all patients (EF 34.7 ± 7.1% at implant), with electrocardiographic evidence of abnormal ventricular conduction. At 6-month, 12-month, and long-term follow-up, EF was 39.9 ± 8.4%, 37.9 ± 9.8%, and 33.3 ± 7.6%, respectively (P > 0.05 for all). There was no difference in the combined end-point of left ventricular assist device (LVAD), cardiac transplant, or death between groups (P = 0.90). At last follow-up [mean duration 12.9 ± 8.3 (median 10.7) years], 8 (89%) in the CRT group were alive. Three and 2 patients underwent LVAD implantation and cardiac heart transplantation, respectively, 15.0 ± 10.1 years from HCM diagnosis and 2.6 ± 0.9 years from CRT implant. In the control group, 4 (44.4%) patients were alive at last follow-up [mean duration 12.0 ± 7.1 (median 12.7) years]. One patient each had LVAD and cardiac transplant.
Conclusions:
CRT in patients with dilated/end-stage HCM does not appear to confer a salutary effect on ventricular function. In medium-term follow-up, however, left ventricular function did not appear to deteriorate further, yet advanced heart failure therapy was common in this group.
More Related Videos
09:16Isolation and Characterization of Cardiac Mesenchymal Stromal Cells from Endomyocardial Bioptic Samples of Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy Patients
Published on: February 28, 2018
12:45Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy IV: Restrictive Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy I: Introduction and Classification
Cardiomyopathy VI: Nursing Management