Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 15, 2026

Use of Two Intracorporeal Ventricular Assist Devices As a Total Artificial Heart
Published on: May 11, 2018
Left ventricular assist device as destination therapy for end stage heart failure: the right time for the right
1Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, Toronto General Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Insights
Destination therapy with ventricular assist devices (VADs) is becoming a viable alternative to heart transplantation. Improved VAD technology and patient management are narrowing survival gaps for end-stage heart failure patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Devices
- Heart Failure Management
Background:
- Cardiac transplantation is the optimal treatment for end-stage heart failure, but organ availability is limited.
- Destination therapy (DT) using durable ventricular assist devices (VADs) offers an alternative for patients ineligible for transplantation.
- The advent of continuous-flow VADs has significantly increased DT-VAD implantations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review current indications for durable VAD implantation for destination therapy.
- To summarize outcomes following durable VAD implantation for destination therapy.
Main Methods:
- Review of current literature on destination therapy VADs.
- Analysis of outcomes including survival rates and adverse events.
- Comparison of DT-VADs with cardiac transplantation.
Main Results:
- In 2014, DT-VADs represented 46% of all VAD implants.
- One- and 2-year survival rates for DT-VADs are comparable to cardiac transplantation.
- Survival differences between VADs in transplant-eligible versus DT patients are narrowing.
- Adherence to management protocols can reduce VAD-related adverse events.
Conclusions:
- Advancements in VAD technology, patient selection, and management have improved outcomes for non-transplant-eligible patients.
- DT-VADs are emerging as a competitive alternative to traditional heart transplantation.
- Continued improvements are expected to further enhance the role of VADs in heart failure management.
Purpose Of Review:
Cardiac transplantation is the gold standard treatment for patients with end-stage heart failure. Unfortunately, the demand for donor organs far outstrips the number of available hearts. Therefore, not all patients who can benefit from this therapy are even listed for transplant. Once destination therapy was approved for the long-term support of nontransplant eligible patients, it was felt that the number of durable ventricular assist device (VAD) implants would increase. It was not until the current generation continuous-flow VADs became available that the number of DT-VAD implants grew significantly. The purpose of this manuscript is to review current indications and outcomes following durable VAD implant for destination therapy.
Recent Findings:
In 2014, DT-VADs accounted for 46% of all implants. A propensity-matched analysis showed that 1-year and 2-year survival rates were similar between LVADs and cardiac transplantation. Likely because of their younger age and lack of comorbidities, survival after VAD implant in transplant eligible patients remains higher than after DT-VAD implant. However, the survival differences are narrowing. Although the rates of LVAD-related adverse events continue to be high, studies such as the PREVENT trial have proven that strict adherence to management protocols can reduce event rates.
Summary:
Improvements in device technology as well as patient selection and management have led to improved medium term (2-4 years) survival after VAD implant in nontransplant eligible patients. We anticipate that this technology will soon be a reasonable and competitive alternative to conventional heart transplantation.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Heart Failure I: Introduction
Heart Failure Drugs: Diuretics
Heart Failure V: Medical Management

