Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Electric Potential and Potential Difference01:16

Electric Potential and Potential Difference

5.8K
Suppose a positive test charge moves away from a positive static charge, then the Coulomb force does positive work, and its electric potential energy decreases. The potential energy per unit charge is defined as the electric potential. The electric potential is independent of the test charge.
When a test charge moves from the initial to the final position, the electric potential difference between those positions is defined as the ratio of the change in the potential energy to the charge on the...
5.8K
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

8.5K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
8.5K
Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test01:14

Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test

3.9K
The F-test is used to compare two sample variances to each other or compare the sample variance to the population variance. It is used to decide whether an indeterminate error can explain the difference in their values. The underlying assumptions that allow the use of the F-test include the data set or sets are normally distributed, and the data sets are independent of each other. The test statistic F is calculated by dividing one variance by another. In other words, the square of one standard...
3.9K
Sum and Difference OpAmps01:22

Sum and Difference OpAmps

1.4K
Operational amplifiers (op-amps) are versatile devices that extend beyond amplification. In this context, two specific op-amp configurations are explored: the summing and difference amplifiers.
A summing amplifier, or an adder, utilizes an op-amp to merge multiple input signals into a single output signal. When audio signals are introduced into its input channels, the input resistors initiate currents that traverse feedback resistors, resulting in an output voltage. Applying Kirchhoff's current...
1.4K
Difference Equation Solution using z-Transform01:24

Difference Equation Solution using z-Transform

656
The z-transform is a powerful tool for analyzing practical discrete-time systems, often represented by linear difference equations. Solving a higher-order difference equation requires knowledge of the input signal and the initial conditions up to one term less than the order of the equation.
The z-transform facilitates handling delayed signals by shifting the signal in the z-domain, which corresponds to delaying the signal in the time domain, and advancing signals by similarly shifting in the...
656
Ionic Crystal Structures02:42

Ionic Crystal Structures

18.1K
Ionic crystals consist of two or more different kinds of ions that usually have different sizes. The packing of these ions into a crystal structure is more complex than the packing of metal atoms that are the same size.
Most monatomic ions behave as charged spheres, and their attraction for ions of opposite charge is the same in every direction. Consequently, stable structures for ionic compounds result (1) when ions of one charge are surrounded by as many ions as possible of the opposite...
18.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Allosteric modulation of the solute carrier transporter SLC39A8 potentiates manganese and cadmium uptake.

The Journal of clinical investigation·2025
Same author

The Need for Continuing Blinded Pose- and Activity Prediction Benchmarks.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2025
Same author

Computational advances in discovering cryptic pockets for drug discovery.

Current opinion in structural biology·2025
Same author

Input Pose is Key to Performance of Free Energy Perturbation: Benchmarking with Monoacylglycerol Lipase.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2024
Same author

Exploring the Application of SiteMap and Site Finder for Focused Cryptic Pocket Identification.

The journal of physical chemistry. B·2024
Same author

Application of AlphaFold models in evaluating ligandable cysteines across E3 ligases.

Proteins·2024
Same journal

Tau protein differentially affects Piezo1 and Kir2.1 channels in brain capillary endothelial cells.

Biophysical journal·2026
Same journal

Emergent Intercellular Junction Stability during Cyclic Tissue Loading.

Biophysical journal·2026
Same journal

Enhanced-Sampling Simulations Reveal Distinct Intermediates in SARS-CoV-2 FSE Pseudoknot Interconversion.

Biophysical journal·2026
Same journal

Structure-based simulations of the full Flock House virus capsid reveal pathways and energetics of an infection-critical peptide externalization event.

Biophysical journal·2026
Same journal

Quantifying the Peripheral Surface Information Entropy from Conformational Ensembles of Globular Protein-Peptide Complexes.

Biophysical journal·2026
Same journal

Anisotropic unbinding and location-dependent hovering of a kinesin motor head over microtubule.

Biophysical journal·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 15, 2026

Sex Differences in Mouse Hippocampal Astrocytes after In-Vitro Ischemia
08:32

Sex Differences in Mouse Hippocampal Astrocytes after In-Vitro Ischemia

Published on: October 25, 2016

13.9K

Dynamic Structural Differences between Human and Mouse STING Lead to Differing Sensitivity to DMXAA.

Amy Y Shih1, Kelly L Damm-Ganamet1, Taraneh Mirzadegan1

  • 1Discovery Sciences, Janssen Research and Development, San Diego, California.

Biophysical Journal
|January 11, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Differences in human and mouse STING protein structure explain why DMXAA, an antitumor drug, works in mice but not humans. This research offers insights for developing new human STING-targeting drugs.

More Related Videos

Assessing Differences in Sperm Competitive Ability in Drosophila
09:34

Assessing Differences in Sperm Competitive Ability in Drosophila

Published on: August 22, 2013

15.1K
Author Spotlight: Advancing Real-Time cAMP Detection in Cells Using cADDis Biosensor
06:03

Author Spotlight: Advancing Real-Time cAMP Detection in Cells Using cADDis Biosensor

Published on: March 22, 2024

1.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 15, 2026

Sex Differences in Mouse Hippocampal Astrocytes after In-Vitro Ischemia
08:32

Sex Differences in Mouse Hippocampal Astrocytes after In-Vitro Ischemia

Published on: October 25, 2016

13.9K
Assessing Differences in Sperm Competitive Ability in Drosophila
09:34

Assessing Differences in Sperm Competitive Ability in Drosophila

Published on: August 22, 2013

15.1K
Author Spotlight: Advancing Real-Time cAMP Detection in Cells Using cADDis Biosensor
06:03

Author Spotlight: Advancing Real-Time cAMP Detection in Cells Using cADDis Biosensor

Published on: March 22, 2024

1.7K

Area of Science:

  • Immunology
  • Molecular Biology
  • Computational Chemistry

Background:

  • The stimulator-of-interferon-genes (STING) protein is a key regulator of innate immunity and a target for cancer immunotherapy.
  • DMXAA, an antitumor agent, demonstrated efficacy in mouse models but failed in human clinical trials due to species-specific differences in STING.
  • Murine STING (mSTING) is sensitive to DMXAA, while human STING (hSTING) is insensitive, posing a challenge for drug translation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the molecular differences between hSTING and mSTING that affect DMXAA binding and activity.
  • To elucidate the conformational preferences of hSTING and mSTING in relation to ligand binding and activation.
  • To identify strategies for designing small-molecule drugs that effectively target hSTING.

Main Methods:

  • Molecular dynamics simulations were used to compare hSTING and mSTING.
  • Simulations focused on the lid region of STING and its role in DMXAA interaction.
  • Conformational analysis was performed to assess the propensity of STING to adopt open-inactive versus closed-active states.

Main Results:

  • A single mutation (G230I) in hSTING rendered it sensitive to DMXAA by creating a steric barrier that prevents drug exit.
  • Wild-type hSTING possesses a porous lid region allowing DMXAA to exit, unlike mSTING.
  • hSTING favors an open-inactive conformation, even when bound to its ligand cGAMP, whereas mSTING prefers a closed-active conformation, irrespective of ligand presence.

Conclusions:

  • Species-specific structural and conformational differences in STING present significant hurdles in translating mouse-active STING-targeting drugs to humans.
  • Understanding these differences, particularly in the lid region and conformational dynamics, is crucial for rational drug design.
  • This study provides a foundation for developing novel small-molecule therapeutics that specifically target and modulate human STING for cancer treatment.