Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 15, 2026

The Miniature Pig: A Large Animal Model for Cochlear Implant Research
Published on: July 28, 2022
Outcomes of ureteroscopy miniaturization on tissue damage and tissue hypoxia in a pig model
Juan P Caballero-Romeu1, Juan A Galán-Llopis2, Federico Soria3
1Urology Department, Alicante University General Hospital, Alicante Institute for Health and Biomedical Research (ISABIAL-FISABIO Foundation), Alicante, Spain. juanpablocaballero@gmail.com.
Abstract:
Miniaturization of ureteroscopy materials is intended to decrease tissue damage. However, tissue hypoxia and the gross and microscopic effects on tissue have not been adequately assessed. We compared the gross and microscopic effects of micro-ureteroscopy (m-URS) and conventional ureteroscopy (URS) on the urinary tract. We employed 14 pigs of the Large White race. URS was performed in one of the ureters with an 8/9.8 F ureteroscope, while a 4.85 F m-URS sheath was used in the contralateral ureter. Gross assessment of ureteral wall damage and ureteral orifice damage was performed. For microscopic assessment hematoxylin-eosin staining and immunohistochemistry for detection of tissue hypoxia were conducted. Regarding the macroscopic assessment of ureteral damage, substantial and significant differences were recorded using URS (C = 0.8), but not with m-URS. Microscopic assessment after staining with hematoxylin-eosin revealed greater epithelial desquamation in the URS group (p < 0.05). Pimonidazole staining revealed greater hypoxia in the epithelial cells than in the remainder of the ureteral layers. We conclude that m-URS causes less damage to the ureteral orifice than URS. Histopathological findings show m-URS reduces ureteral epithelial damage compared with conventional ureteroscopy. Both URS and m-URS cause cellular hypoxia.
Insights
Micro-ureteroscopy (m-URS) causes less ureteral orifice and epithelial damage than conventional ureteroscopy (URS). Both techniques, however, induce cellular hypoxia in the urinary tract.
Area of Science:
- Urology
- Minimally Invasive Surgery
- Histopathology
Background:
- Miniaturization of ureteroscopy (URS) aims to reduce tissue trauma.
- The impact of micro-ureteroscopy (m-URS) on tissue hypoxia and damage requires thorough evaluation.
- Previous studies have not adequately assessed the gross and microscopic effects of m-URS versus conventional URS.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the gross and microscopic tissue damage caused by m-URS and conventional URS.
- To assess the incidence of tissue hypoxia associated with both ureteroscopy techniques.
Main Methods:
- A comparative study was conducted on 14 pigs.
- Conventional URS (8/9.8 F) was performed on one ureter, and m-URS (4.85 F sheath) on the contralateral ureter.
- Gross assessment of ureteral wall and orifice damage, hematoxylin-eosin staining, and pimonidazole staining for hypoxia were utilized.
Main Results:
- Conventional URS showed significant ureteral wall damage, while m-URS did not.
- Microscopic analysis revealed greater epithelial desquamation with conventional URS compared to m-URS.
- Pimonidazole staining indicated significant hypoxia in epithelial cells for both URS and m-URS.
Conclusions:
- Micro-ureteroscopy results in less damage to the ureteral orifice and epithelium than conventional ureteroscopy.
- Histopathological findings support the reduced tissue trauma associated with m-URS.
- Both conventional URS and m-URS are associated with cellular hypoxia.
Related Concept Videos
Tissues
Tissues
Plant Cells and Tissues
Plant Tissue Culture
Hypoxia
Types of Hypoxia
There are four primary types of hypoxia, each resulting from a different cause:
1. Anemic hypoxia: This type occurs due to insufficient oxygen delivery caused by a lack of red blood cells (RBCs) or RBCs with abnormal or...
Tissue Membranes
Connective Tissue Membranes
The connective tissue membrane is formed solely from connective tissue. These membranes encapsulate organs, such as the kidneys, and line our movable joints. A synovial...

