Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Cooperative Allosteric Transitions01:58

Cooperative Allosteric Transitions

8.9K
Cooperative allosteric transitions can occur in multimeric proteins, where each subunit of the protein has its own ligand-binding site. When a ligand binds to any of these subunits, it triggers a conformational change that affects the binding sites in the other subunits; this can change the affinity of the other sites for their respective ligands. The ability of the protein to change the shape of its binding site is attributed to the presence of a mix of flexible and stable segments in the...
8.9K
Cooperative Allosteric Transitions01:58

Cooperative Allosteric Transitions

3.1K
3.1K
Cooperative Allosteric Transitions01:58

Cooperative Allosteric Transitions

2.7K
2.7K
Punishment01:27

Punishment

990
Negative reinforcement and punishment are often confused but serve distinct functions in behavior modification. Reinforcement, whether positive or negative, increases the likelihood of a desired behavior, while punishment decreases it.
Punishment can be positive or negative. Positive punishment involves adding an undesirable stimulus, such as scolding, to decrease a behavior. Negative punishment involves removing a desirable stimulus, such as taking away a favorite toy, to decrease behavior....
990
Cooperative Binding of Transcription Regulators02:13

Cooperative Binding of Transcription Regulators

7.4K
Transcriptional regulators bind to specific cis-regulatory sequences in the DNA to regulate gene transcription. These cis-regulatory sequences are very short, usually less than ten nucleotide pairs in length. The short length means that there is a high probability of the exact same sequence randomly occurring throughout the genome.  Since regulators can also bind to groups of similar sequences, this further increases the chances of random binding. Transcriptional regulators form...
7.4K
Cooperative Binding of Transcription Regulators02:13

Cooperative Binding of Transcription Regulators

2.6K
2.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Association Between Time-Averaged Serum Uric Acid and Renal Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Chronic Kidney Disease: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.

Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders·2026
Same author

Tuning the Multinetwork Structures of Acetoacetylated Poly(vinyl alcohol) Adhesives for Polarizers with Zn<sup>2+</sup>: Achieving Synergistic Improvements in Cohesion and Interfacial Bonding.

Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids·2026
Same author

Stereospecific Epoxide-to-Cyclopropylamine Conversion by a Homologous Horner-Wadsworth-Emmons-Type Reaction With an Imine-Substituted Phosphine Oxide.

Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English)·2026
Same author

Realization of High-Reliable Coherent-State Quantum Secure Communication.

Research (Washington, D.C.)·2026
Same author

Cooperation conflicts with equality when allocating public goods.

Nature·2026
Same author

Community structure-regulation coupling reveals optimal information diffusion.

Nature communications·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 15, 2026

A Procedure to Study Stress-Induced Relapse of Heroin Seeking after Punishment-Imposed Abstinence
08:05

A Procedure to Study Stress-Induced Relapse of Heroin Seeking after Punishment-Imposed Abstinence

Published on: March 23, 2022

3.1K

Conditional punishment is a double-edged sword in promoting cooperation.

Feng Huang1,2, Xiaojie Chen3, Long Wang1

  • 1Center for Systems and Control, College of Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China.

Scientific Reports
|January 12, 2018
PubMed
Summary

Conditional punishment can either promote or inhibit cooperation in public goods games. Cooperation is enhanced when punishment is easy to enact but hindered when it is difficult, revealing a double-edged sword effect.

More Related Videos

Using Next Generation Sequencing to Identify Mutations Associated with Repair of a CAS9-induced Double Strand Break Near the CD4 Promoter
06:59

Using Next Generation Sequencing to Identify Mutations Associated with Repair of a CAS9-induced Double Strand Break Near the CD4 Promoter

Published on: March 31, 2022

2.9K
Plant Promoter Analysis: Identification and Characterization of Root Nodule Specific Promoter in the Common Bean
10:58

Plant Promoter Analysis: Identification and Characterization of Root Nodule Specific Promoter in the Common Bean

Published on: December 23, 2017

13.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 15, 2026

A Procedure to Study Stress-Induced Relapse of Heroin Seeking after Punishment-Imposed Abstinence
08:05

A Procedure to Study Stress-Induced Relapse of Heroin Seeking after Punishment-Imposed Abstinence

Published on: March 23, 2022

3.1K
Using Next Generation Sequencing to Identify Mutations Associated with Repair of a CAS9-induced Double Strand Break Near the CD4 Promoter
06:59

Using Next Generation Sequencing to Identify Mutations Associated with Repair of a CAS9-induced Double Strand Break Near the CD4 Promoter

Published on: March 31, 2022

2.9K
Plant Promoter Analysis: Identification and Characterization of Root Nodule Specific Promoter in the Common Bean
10:58

Plant Promoter Analysis: Identification and Characterization of Root Nodule Specific Promoter in the Common Bean

Published on: December 23, 2017

13.1K

Area of Science:

  • Social Sciences
  • Behavioral Economics
  • Game Theory

Background:

  • Punishment deters free-riders but is costly, leading to the second-order free-rider problem.
  • Individuals often prefer conditional punishment, basing their decisions on others' actions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a theoretical model for conditional punishment.
  • To investigate its influence on cooperation in public goods games.

Main Methods:

  • Theoretical modeling of conditional punishment strategies.
  • Analysis of cooperation dynamics in well-mixed and structured populations.

Main Results:

  • Conditional punishment exhibits a double-edged sword effect on cooperation.
  • Low thresholds for punishment facilitate cooperation, while high thresholds inhibit it.

Conclusions:

  • Conditional punishment's impact on cooperation is contingent on the ease of its activation.
  • The findings highlight the nuanced role of punishment in maintaining social order.