Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 15, 2026

In Vitro Methods for Comparing Target Binding and CDC Induction Between Therapeutic Antibodies: Applications in Biosimilarity Analysis
Published on: May 4, 2017
A comprehensive approach for evaluating charge heterogeneity in biosimilars
Zhiliang Xiao1, Xiaohang Yin1, Lina Han1
1Luye Pharmaceuticals, Inc., No.9 Baoyuan Road, Laishan District, Yantai 264003, China.
Biosimilar development requires evaluating charge variants in monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). This study shows a cause-based approach, identifying the same factors causing charge variants in both reference and biosimilar products, is superior to a profile-based method.
Area of Science:
- Biopharmaceutical development
- Protein characterization
- Monoclonal antibody (mAb) analysis
Background:
- Charge heterogeneity is a universal characteristic of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and a key parameter evaluated during biosimilar development.
- Current industry practice often focuses on matching the overall charge profile of a biosimilar to its reference product.
- However, similar charge profiles may arise from different underlying mechanisms, introducing uncertainty in biosimilarity assessment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To comprehensively investigate the charge variants of a therapeutic monoclonal antibody and its biosimilar candidate.
- To compare the factors contributing to charge heterogeneity in both the reference product and the biosimilar.
- To propose a cause-based approach for charge variant evaluation in biosimilar development.
Main Methods:
- Comparative analysis of charge variants between a reference monoclonal antibody and its biosimilar candidate.
- Identification and characterization of the specific factors responsible for charge heterogeneity in both products.
- Evaluation of the suitability of a cause-based approach versus a profile-based approach for biosimilar charge assessment.
Main Results:
- The biosimilar candidate exhibited a similar overall charge profile to the reference product.
- Crucially, the same underlying factors were identified as contributing to the charge variants in both the reference and biosimilar products.
- This indicates a shared mechanism for charge heterogeneity, not just a similar outcome.
Conclusions:
- A cause-based approach for evaluating charge variants in biosimilar development is more robust than a profile-based method.
- Understanding the mechanisms driving charge heterogeneity mitigates risks associated with biosimilarity assessment.
- This rational, mechanism-driven approach enhances confidence in biosimilar product quality and comparability.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Formal Charges
Ions and Ionic Charges
Drug Products: Biologics, Biosimilars and Interchangeables
Atomic Radii and Effective Nuclear Charge
Electric Charges
The English physicist William Gilbert studied the phenomenon of static electricity in...
Charge on a Conductor

