Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)01:20

Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)

1.7K
Two NMR-active nuclei bonded to a central atom can be involved in geminal or two-bond coupling. Geminal coupling is commonly seen between diastereotopic protons in chiral molecules and unsymmetrical alkenes, among others.
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
1.7K
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)01:22

Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)

1.5K
Vicinal or three-bond coupling is commonly observed between protons attached to adjacent carbons. Here, nuclear spin information is primarily transferred via electron spin interactions between adjacent C‑H bond orbitals. This generally favors the antiparallel arrangement of spins, so 3J values are usually positive.
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the involved orbitals. The...
1.5K
Electric Potential and Potential Difference01:16

Electric Potential and Potential Difference

5.8K
Suppose a positive test charge moves away from a positive static charge, then the Coulomb force does positive work, and its electric potential energy decreases. The potential energy per unit charge is defined as the electric potential. The electric potential is independent of the test charge.
When a test charge moves from the initial to the final position, the electric potential difference between those positions is defined as the ratio of the change in the potential energy to the charge on the...
5.8K
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

8.5K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
8.5K
Conservation of Mass in Finite Cotrol Volume01:16

Conservation of Mass in Finite Cotrol Volume

1.8K
The principle of conservation of mass is a fundamental law in fluid mechanics and is applied using the continuity equation. We apply the concept to a finite control volume to derive the continuity equation.
A system is defined as a collection of unchanging contents, and the conservation of mass states that a system's mass is constant.
1.8K
Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test01:14

Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test

3.9K
The F-test is used to compare two sample variances to each other or compare the sample variance to the population variance. It is used to decide whether an indeterminate error can explain the difference in their values. The underlying assumptions that allow the use of the F-test include the data set or sets are normally distributed, and the data sets are independent of each other. The test statistic F is calculated by dividing one variance by another. In other words, the square of one standard...
3.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Mass-invariant universal optical conductivity from quantum geometry.

Science advances·2026
Same author

Ultrafast anisotropic exciton transport in phosphorene.

Nanoscale·2026
Same author

Topologically enhanced exciton transport.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

Anharmonic phonons in the high-temperature phase of KNiCl<sub>3</sub>.

Structural dynamics (Melville, N.Y.)·2025
Same author

Band-Gap Tunability in Anharmonic Perovskite-Like Semiconductors Driven by Polar Electron-Phonon Coupling.

Journal of the American Chemical Society·2025
Same author

Excitonic topology and quantum geometry in organic semiconductors.

Nature communications·2025
Same journal

Interplay of Anisotropy, Dzyaloshinskii Moriya Interaction and Symmetry breaking Fields in a 2D XY Ferromagnet.

Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal·2026
Same journal

Single-molecule electron transport near a charge-trapping orbital-level alignment.

Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal·2026
Same journal

Δ<sub>T</sub>Noise as a Robust Diagnostic for Chiral, Helical and Trivial Edge Modes.

Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal·2026
Same journal

A Quantum Framework for Negative Magnetoresistance in Multi-Weyl Semimetals.

Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal·2026
Same journal

Magnetic anisotropy and electronic structure in surface-supported single rare-earth atom magnets: a topical review.

Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal·2026
Same journal

Modeling thermal transport in AlN/GaN superlattices and heterostructures with machine-learned force fields.

Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 15, 2026

High Resolution Phonon-assisted Quasi-resonance Fluorescence Spectroscopy
10:40

High Resolution Phonon-assisted Quasi-resonance Fluorescence Spectroscopy

Published on: June 28, 2016

8.0K

Electron-phonon coupling from finite differences.

Bartomeu Monserrat1,2

  • 1Department of Physics and Astronomy, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854-8019, United States of America.

Journal of Physics. Condensed Matter : an Institute of Physics Journal
|January 13, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Calculating electron-phonon coupling using finite differences offers accurate, material-specific insights into phenomena like superconductivity. Recent advances overcome computational costs, making this method a powerful tool for materials science research.

More Related Videos

A Coupled Experiment-finite Element Modeling Methodology for Assessing High Strain Rate Mechanical Response of Soft Biomaterials
11:28

A Coupled Experiment-finite Element Modeling Methodology for Assessing High Strain Rate Mechanical Response of Soft Biomaterials

Published on: May 18, 2015

13.0K
Automatic Laser-based Geometry Capture for Finite Element Analysis of Weld Beads
07:58

Automatic Laser-based Geometry Capture for Finite Element Analysis of Weld Beads

Published on: July 25, 2025

889

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 15, 2026

High Resolution Phonon-assisted Quasi-resonance Fluorescence Spectroscopy
10:40

High Resolution Phonon-assisted Quasi-resonance Fluorescence Spectroscopy

Published on: June 28, 2016

8.0K
A Coupled Experiment-finite Element Modeling Methodology for Assessing High Strain Rate Mechanical Response of Soft Biomaterials
11:28

A Coupled Experiment-finite Element Modeling Methodology for Assessing High Strain Rate Mechanical Response of Soft Biomaterials

Published on: May 18, 2015

13.0K
Automatic Laser-based Geometry Capture for Finite Element Analysis of Weld Beads
07:58

Automatic Laser-based Geometry Capture for Finite Element Analysis of Weld Beads

Published on: July 25, 2025

889

Area of Science:

  • Physics, Chemistry, and Materials Science
  • Condensed Matter Physics
  • Computational Materials Science

Background:

  • Electron-phonon interactions are fundamental to diverse physical phenomena, including superconductivity and electronic transport.
  • Accurate, material-specific understanding requires first-principles calculations of electron-phonon coupling.
  • Traditional methods face limitations in flexibility and incorporating higher-order interactions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the first-principles calculation of electron-phonon coupling using the finite differences approach.
  • To highlight recent advancements that mitigate computational challenges.
  • To showcase the method's applicability across various materials science problems.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing the finite differences approach for first-principles electron-phonon coupling calculations.
  • Employing techniques like nondiagonal supercells and thermal lines to improve efficiency.
  • Integrating with various electronic structure methods and incorporating higher-order terms.

Main Results:

  • The finite differences method allows for the use of any electronic structure technique and readily includes terms beyond the lowest order.
  • Recent advances have significantly reduced the computational cost, enabling wider adoption.
  • The method has been successfully applied to study optical spectra, superconductivity, charge transport, and defect roles.

Conclusions:

  • The finite differences approach is a powerful and versatile tool for studying electron-phonon interactions.
  • It is essential for accurately describing phenomena where semilocal density functional theory is insufficient or higher-order interactions are critical.
  • This method is poised to be central in future research on electron-phonon coupling.