Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 15, 2026

Author Spotlight: Unveiling Prognostic Indicators in Heart Failure - The Role of Phase Angle and Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis
Published on: June 30, 2023
Novel Wearable Seismocardiography and Machine Learning Algorithms Can Assess Clinical Status of Heart Failure
Omer T Inan1, Maziyar Baran Pouyan2, Abdul Q Javaid2
1From the School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta (O.T.I., M.B.P., A.Q.J., A.D., A.O.B.); Division of Cardiology (S.D., T.D.M., L.K.) and Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences (S.R.), University of California, San Francisco; and Department of Anesthesiology and Department of Biomedical Engineering, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL (M.E., J.A.H.). inan@gatech.edu.
Background:
Remote monitoring of patients with heart failure (HF) using wearable devices can allow patient-specific adjustments to treatments and thereby potentially reduce hospitalizations. We aimed to assess HF state using wearable measurements of electrical and mechanical aspects of cardiac function in the context of exercise.
Methods And Results:
Patients with compensated (outpatient) and decompensated (hospitalized) HF were fitted with a wearable ECG and seismocardiogram sensing patch. Patients stood at rest for an initial recording, performed a 6-minute walk test, and then stood at rest for 5 minutes of recovery. The protocol was performed at the time of outpatient visit or at 2 time points (admission and discharge) during an HF hospitalization. To assess patient state, we devised a method based on comparing the similarity of the structure of seismocardiogram signals after exercise compared with rest using graph mining (graph similarity score). We found that graph similarity score can assess HF patient state and correlates to clinical improvement in 45 patients (13 decompensated, 32 compensated). A significant difference was found between the groups in the graph similarity score metric (44.4±4.9 [decompensated HF] versus 35.2±10.5 [compensated HF]; P<0.001). In the 6 decompensated patients with longitudinal data, we found a significant change in graph similarity score from admission (decompensated) to discharge (compensated; 44±4.1 [admitted] versus 35±3.9 [discharged]; P<0.05).
Conclusions:
Wearable technologies recording cardiac function and machine learning algorithms can assess compensated and decompensated HF states by analyzing cardiac response to submaximal exercise. These techniques can be tested in the future to track the clinical status of outpatients with HF and their response to pharmacological interventions.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure III: Clinical Manifestations
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Heart Failure I: Introduction
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Heart Failure Drugs: Diuretics

