Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Naturalistic Observations02:30

Naturalistic Observations

17.6K
If you want to understand how behavior occurs, one of the best ways to gain information is to simply observe the behavior in its natural context. However, people might change their behavior in unexpected ways if they know they are being observed. How do researchers obtain accurate information when people tend to hide their natural behavior? As an example, imagine that your professor asks everyone in your class to raise their hand if they always wash their hands after using the restroom. Chances...
17.6K
Reliability and Validity01:29

Reliability and Validity

14.1K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
14.1K
Introduction to z Scores01:06

Introduction to z Scores

11.4K
A z score (or standardized value) is measured in units of the standard deviation. It tells you how many standard deviations the value x is above (to the right of) or below (to the left of) the mean, μ. Values of x that are larger than the mean have positive z scores, and values of x that are smaller than the mean have negative z scores. If x equals the mean, then x has a zero z score. It is important to note that the mean of the z scores is zero, and the standard deviation is one.
z scores...
11.4K
Introduction to z Scores01:05

Introduction to z Scores

1.4K
A z score (or standardized value) is measured in units of the standard deviation. It indicates how many standard deviations the value x is above (to the right of) or below (to the left of) the mean, μ. Values of x that are larger than the mean have positive z scores, and values of x that are smaller than the mean have negative z scores. If x equals the mean, then x has a zero z score. It is important to note that the mean of the z scores is zero, and the standard deviation is one.
z scores...
1.4K
z Scores and Area Under the Curve01:17

z Scores and Area Under the Curve

19.7K
z scores are the standardized values obtained after converting a normal distribution into a standard normal distribution. A z score is measured in units of the standard deviation. The z score tells you how many standard deviations the value x is above (to the right of) or below (to the left of) the mean, μ. Values of x that are larger than the mean have positive z scores, and values of x that are smaller than the mean have negative z scores. If x equals the mean, then x has a z score of...
19.7K
Distribution Reliability and Automation01:25

Distribution Reliability and Automation

521
Distribution reliability in electrical power systems is critical for ensuring an uninterrupted power supply to consumers at minimal cost. According to IEEE Standard Terms, reliability is the probability that a device will function without failure over a specified time period or amount of usage. For electric power distribution, this translates to maintaining continuous power supply and addressing customer concerns over power outages. Several indices, as defined by IEEE Standard 1366-2012, are...
521

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Consensus-based definition of paediatric out-of-hospital clinical deterioration: a modified delphi study.

Emergency medicine journal : EMJ·2026
Same author

Survey of practices around the measurement and replacement of calcium in paediatric major trauma.

BMJ paediatrics open·2026
Same author

Emergency department redirection: necessary inconvenience or unacceptable patient experience?

Pediatric research·2026
Same author

Maternal perspectives on the RSV vaccine (Abrysvo): a thematic analysis of survey findings from the first season of implementation in England and Scotland.

Archives of disease in childhood·2026
Same author

Determining the feasibility of randomising infants, children and young people to invasive and non-invasive urine sampling techniques (FROG): Protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled feasibility trial and mixed methods perspectives' study of RCT feasibility.

NIHR open research·2025
Same author

Training for Pediatric Sepsis-A Medical Education Perspective and Potential Role of Artificial Intelligence.

Children (Basel, Switzerland)·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 15, 2026

Isokinetic Robotic Device to Improve Test-Retest and Inter-Rater Reliability for Stretch Reflex Measurements in Stroke Patients with Spasticity
08:40

Isokinetic Robotic Device to Improve Test-Retest and Inter-Rater Reliability for Stretch Reflex Measurements in Stroke Patients with Spasticity

Published on: June 12, 2019

7.9K

Inter-rater reliability in the Paediatric Observation Priority Score (POPS).

Lisa Langton1, Adam Bonfield1, Damian Roland1,2

  • 1Paediatric Emergency Medicine Leicester Academic (PEMLA) Group, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK.

Archives of Disease in Childhood
|January 14, 2018
PubMed
Summary

This study found good inter-rater reliability for the Paediatric Observation Priority Score (POPS) among nursing staff in emergency departments. The POPS tool effectively supports consistent assessment of pediatric patients.

Keywords:
early warning scoreemergency severity indexinter-rater reliabilitynursing

More Related Videos

Use of a Video Scoring Anchor for Rapid Serial Assessment of Social Communication in Toddlers
09:16

Use of a Video Scoring Anchor for Rapid Serial Assessment of Social Communication in Toddlers

Published on: March 14, 2018

10.8K
Laparoscopic Anatomical Liver Segment VII Resection with Liver Parenchymal Transection Following a Priority Approach
13:57

Laparoscopic Anatomical Liver Segment VII Resection with Liver Parenchymal Transection Following a Priority Approach

Published on: May 23, 2025

1.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 15, 2026

Isokinetic Robotic Device to Improve Test-Retest and Inter-Rater Reliability for Stretch Reflex Measurements in Stroke Patients with Spasticity
08:40

Isokinetic Robotic Device to Improve Test-Retest and Inter-Rater Reliability for Stretch Reflex Measurements in Stroke Patients with Spasticity

Published on: June 12, 2019

7.9K
Use of a Video Scoring Anchor for Rapid Serial Assessment of Social Communication in Toddlers
09:16

Use of a Video Scoring Anchor for Rapid Serial Assessment of Social Communication in Toddlers

Published on: March 14, 2018

10.8K
Laparoscopic Anatomical Liver Segment VII Resection with Liver Parenchymal Transection Following a Priority Approach
13:57

Laparoscopic Anatomical Liver Segment VII Resection with Liver Parenchymal Transection Following a Priority Approach

Published on: May 23, 2025

1.5K

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Emergency Medicine
  • Nursing Assessment Tools
  • Clinical Reliability Studies

Background:

  • Accurate and consistent patient assessment is crucial in pediatric emergency settings.
  • The Paediatric Observation Priority Score (POPS) is a tool used to prioritize pediatric patients.
  • Evaluating the reliability of assessment tools ensures standardized care.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the inter-rater reliability of the Paediatric Observation Priority Score (POPS) among nursing staff.
  • To determine the consistency of POPS scoring by different nurses in a pediatric emergency department.

Main Methods:

  • A retrospective observational study was conducted in a single-center pediatric emergency department.
  • 12 nursing staff participants reviewed video footage of pediatric assessments and scored them using POPS.
  • Participants were blinded to original scores, and a questionnaire assessed their POPS experience.

Main Results:

  • Inter-rater reliability for POPS was evaluated using kappa values.
  • Kappa values were 0.74 for case 1, 1.00 for case 2 (perfect agreement), and 0.66 for case 3.
  • These results indicate good to perfect agreement among raters.

Conclusions:

  • The Paediatric Observation Priority Score (POPS) demonstrates good inter-rater reliability among nursing staff.
  • POPS can be reliably used for assessing sick children in the emergency department.
  • Consistent application of POPS supports standardized pediatric emergency care.