Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 15, 2026

Mouse Eye Enucleation for Remote High-throughput Phenotyping
Published on: November 19, 2011
Seabirds fighting for land: phenotypic consequences of breeding area constraints at a small remote archipelago
Guilherme Tavares Nunes1, Sophie Bertrand2,3, Leandro Bugoni4
1Universidade Federal do Rio Grande (FURG), Laboratório de Aves Aquáticas e Tartarugas Marinhas, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas & Programa de Pós-Graduação em Oceanografia Biológica, CP 474, Rio Grande, RS, Brazil. gtn.biomar@yahoo.com.br.
Abstract:
Identifying associations between phenotypes and environmental parameters is crucial for understanding how natural selection acts at the individual level. In this context, genetically isolated populations can be useful models for identifying the forces selecting fitness-related traits. Here, we use a comprehensive dataset on a genetically and ecologically isolated population of the strictly marine bird, the brown booby Sula leucogaster, at the tropical and remote Saint Peter and Saint Paul Archipelago, mid-Atlantic Ocean, in order to detect phenotypic adjustments from interindividual differences in diet, foraging behaviour, and nest quality. For this, we took biometrics of all individuals of the colony breeding in 2014 and 2015 and tested their associations with nest quality, diet parameters, and foraging behaviour. While body size was not related to the foraging parameters, the body size of the females (responsible for nest acquisition and defence) was significantly associated with the nest quality, as larger females occupied high-quality nests. Our findings suggest that the small breeding area, rather than prey availability, is a limiting factor, emphasizing the role of on-land features in shaping phenotypic characteristics and fitness in land-dependent marine vertebrates.
Related Concept Videos
The Colonization of Land
Plant Breeding and Biotechnology
Timing and Consequences on Behavior
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant...
Constraints and Statical Determinacy
Background and Environment Affect Phenotype
An example of how genetic background affects phenotype can be seen in horses. The Extension gene in horses is responsible for their coat color. A wild-type gene (EE) produces black pigment in the coat, while a mutant gene (ee) produces red pigment. A...
Pharmacogenetic Phenotypes: Alterations in Pharmacokinetics, Drug Targets and Biologic Milieu

