Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 15, 2026

Author Spotlight: Advancing Early Detection and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Tumors
Published on: February 16, 2024
Carcinogenic potential of antitumor therapies - is the risk predictable?
Ivanka Nenova1, Janet Grudeva-Popova
1Department of Clinical Oncology, Medical University, Plovdiv, Bulgaria.
Abstract:
The growing number of successfully cured cancer patients has created a new field in oncogenesis. The life expectancy of such patients has increased, however this favorable event may create enough time for epigenetic events to occur which can cause a new carcinognic event, i.e. a secondary malignancy. The terms in use are second primary malignancies as well as therapy-related neoplasms in case the treatment of the first neoplasm is a direct cause. Second primary malignancies can be hematological neoplasms or solid tumors, with solid tumors having higher frequency. Hematological malignancies, especially t MDS (therapy-related myelodysplastic syndrome) and t AML (therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia), are causally associated with cytotoxic chemotherapy, while secondary solid tumors are related to radiotherapy. The pathogenic mechanisms of clonal selection in second malignancies are in connection with induction of fusion oncogenes, induction of genetic instability, selection of resistant cell clones and hereditary predisposition. The most common oncogenic agents are external (antineoplastic systemic treatments including radiation therapy), patient-specific factors (genetic, demographic, hormonal) and tumorspecific factors (tissue radiosensitivity, immunodeficiency). There are special features in the clinical picture, biological characteristics and evolution of the second neoplasm - different latency period, aggressive course and treatment resistance. Risks, types and characteristics of secondary malignancies are analyzed in specific groups of patients. For example, the peak of t-AML is several years after a primary malignancy and for solid tumors, the risk increases progressively during the observation period. In this review, the authors outline that the risk of second malignancies is predictable and can be controllable by adequate monitoring of patients as well as by personalized treatment of the first neoplasm.
Insights
Increased cancer survival leads to secondary malignancies. Early detection and personalized treatments can mitigate risks of these new cancers, improving long-term patient outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Oncogenesis
- Cancer Epidemiology
- Cancer Survivorship
Background:
- Growing number of cancer survivors necessitates understanding long-term effects.
- Increased life expectancy allows for epigenetic changes leading to secondary malignancies.
- Secondary cancers, or second primary malignancies, are a significant concern in cancer survivorship.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the risks, types, and characteristics of secondary malignancies.
- To analyze pathogenic mechanisms and oncogenic agents involved in secondary cancer development.
- To highlight the predictability and controllability of secondary malignancy risk.
Main Methods:
- Literature review of oncogenesis and cancer survivorship studies.
- Analysis of pathogenic mechanisms including clonal selection and oncogenic agents.
- Examination of clinical features, biological characteristics, and evolution of secondary neoplasms.
Main Results:
- Secondary malignancies can be hematological (e.g., therapy-related myelodysplastic syndrome, therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia) or solid tumors.
- Therapy-related hematological neoplasms are linked to chemotherapy, while secondary solid tumors are associated with radiotherapy.
- Oncogenic mechanisms involve fusion oncogenes, genetic instability, resistant clones, and patient/tumor factors.
Conclusions:
- Secondary malignancies exhibit distinct clinical features, including variable latency periods and treatment resistance.
- Risk stratification and personalized treatment of the primary neoplasm are crucial.
- Adequate patient monitoring and tailored therapeutic strategies can control the risk of secondary malignancies.
More Related Videos
09:57Evaluation of the In vivo Antitumor Activity of Polyanhydride IL-1α Nanoparticles
Published on: June 28, 2021
04:09Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Published on: October 10, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity
Predicting Molecular Geometry
Standard Electrode Potentials
Relative Risk
Prediction Intervals
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.
Gene Therapy