Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 15, 2026

Four Temporary Waterslide Designs Adapted to Different Slope Conditions to Encourage Child Socialization in Playgrounds
Published on: December 9, 2022
Temporary exclusion of ill children from childcare centres in Switzerland: practice, problems and potential solutions
Benjamin Sticher1, Julia Bielicki1, Christoph Berger2
1Division of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology and Children's Research Center, University Children's Hospital Zurich, Steinwiesstrasse 75, 8032, Zürich, Switzerland.
Insights
Childcare staff face challenges excluding ill children due to unclear guidelines. Developing specific recommendations on fever, contagiousness, and medication use can improve decision-making and reduce disease spread in childcare settings.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Childcare Management
- Infectious Disease Control
Background:
- Temporary exclusion of ill children is key to preventing disease transmission in childcare.
- Childcare staff often struggle with exclusion decisions, even with existing guidelines.
- This study addresses ambiguities in ill-child exclusion policies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To describe, quantify, and analyze ambiguities in childcare exclusion criteria.
- To identify challenges faced by childcare staff in managing ill children.
- To discuss potential solutions for clearer exclusion policies.
Main Methods:
- Cross-sectional study utilizing postal surveys sent to childcare directors in Zurich.
- Survey included questions on exclusion criteria and encountered ambiguities.
- Analysis of how existing guidelines address identified ambiguities.
Main Results:
- A 51% response rate from 488 childcare directors.
- Fever and contagiousness were primary exclusion criteria.
- Conjunctivitis and antipyretic drug use caused significant ambiguities.
Conclusions:
- Written recommendations are needed to clarify exclusion criteria for ill children.
- Guidelines should address antipyretics and teething, allowing local adaptation.
- Collaboration with pediatricians can further support decision-making.
Background:
In childcare centres, temporary exclusion of ill children, if their illness poses a risk of spread of harmful diseases to others, is a central approach to fight disease transmission. However, not all ill children need to be excluded. Previous studies suggested that childcare centre staff have difficulties in deciding whether or not to exclude an ill child, even when official ill-child guidelines are used. We aimed to describe, quantify and analyse these ambiguities and discuss potential solutions.
Methods:
For this cross-sectional study, we sent postal surveys to 488 childcare centre directors in the Swiss Canton of Zurich, where no official ill-child guideline is in place. We asked for exclusion criteria for ill children and ambiguities faced when dealing with ill children. We checked whether existing guidelines provided solutions to the ambiguities identified.
Results:
249/488 (51%) directors responded to the survey. The most common exclusion criteria were fever (87.4%) and contagiousness (52.2%). Ambiguities were mostly caused by conjunctivitis (23.7%) and use of antipyretic drugs (22.9%). Roughly one third of the ambiguities identified could have been resolved with existing guidelines, another third if existing guidelines contained additional information. For the last third, clear written directives are difficult to formulate.
Conclusions:
Written recommendations may help to clarify when an ill child should temporarily be excluded. However, such a guideline should cover the topics antipyretic drugs and teething and have room for modification to local circumstances. Collaboration with a paediatrician may be of additional benefit.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
The Pauli Exclusion Principle
Solution Formation
This selective...
Electrolyte and Nonelectrolyte Solutions
Size-Exclusion Chromatography
Silica particles offer advantages such as rigidity,...
Ideal Solutions
General Properties of Solutions

