Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Coefficient of Correlation01:12

Coefficient of Correlation

8.7K
The correlation coefficient, r, developed by Karl Pearson in the early 1900s, is numerical and provides a measure of strength and direction of the linear association between the independent variable x and the dependent variable y.
If you suspect a linear relationship between x and y, then r can measure how strong the linear relationship is.
What the VALUE of r tells us:
The value of r is always between –1 and +1: –1 ≤ r ≤ 1.
The size of the correlation r indicates the...
8.7K
Calibration Curves: Correlation Coefficient01:10

Calibration Curves: Correlation Coefficient

5.0K
In a linear calibration curve, there is a value called the calibration coefficient, denoted by 'r,' which measures the strength and the direction of association between two variables. The correlation coefficient value ranges from −1 to +1. A value of +1 indicates a perfect positive linear correlation, −1 denotes a perfect negative correlation, and 0 implies no correlation between the two variables. A positive correlation value establishes that as one variable increases, the...
5.0K
Calculating and Interpreting the Linear Correlation Coefficient01:11

Calculating and Interpreting the Linear Correlation Coefficient

8.3K
The correlation coefficient, r, developed by Karl Pearson in the early 1900s, is numerical and provides a measure of strength and direction of the linear association between the independent variable, x, and the dependent variable, y. Hence, it is also known as the Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient. It can be calculated using the following equation:
8.3K
Correlation of Experimental Data01:23

Correlation of Experimental Data

492
Dimensional analysis simplifies complex physical problems and guides experimental investigations, but it does not provide complete solutions. It identifies the dimensionless groups that influence a phenomenon, but experimental data is needed to establish the specific relationships and validate theoretical predictions.
For example, a spherical particle moving through a viscous fluid experiences drag. Dimensional analysis shows that the drag force depends on the particle's diameter, velocity,...
492
Correlations02:20

Correlations

36.6K
Correlation means that there is a relationship between two or more variables (such as ice cream consumption and crime), but this relationship does not necessarily imply cause and effect. When two variables are correlated, it simply means that as one variable changes, so does the other. We can measure correlation by calculating a statistic known as a correlation coefficient. A correlation coefficient is a number from -1 to +1 that indicates the strength and direction of the relationship between...
36.6K
Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data01:16

Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data

514
Statistical inference techniques, paramount in hypothesis testing, differentiate into two broad categories: parametric and nonparametric statistics.
Parametric statistics, as the name suggests, assumes that data follow a specific distribution, often a normal distribution. This assumption enables robust hypothesis testing and estimation. Parametric methods, like the Student's t-test or Goodness-of-fit test, are frequently employed in biostatistics due to their robustness. For instance,...
514

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Inference about binocular sensitivity and specificity of screening tests for paired organs.

Statistical methods in medical research·2019
Same author

A reproducible robust likelihood approach to inference about marginal characteristics of binary data in paired settings.

Statistical methods in medical research·2019
Same author

Robust likelihood inference for diagnostic accuracy measures for paired organs.

Statistical methods in medical research·2018
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 15, 2026

Easy Measurement of Diffusion Coefficients of EGFP-tagged Plasma Membrane Proteins Using k-Space Image Correlation Spectroscopy
11:43

Easy Measurement of Diffusion Coefficients of EGFP-tagged Plasma Membrane Proteins Using k-Space Image Correlation Spectroscopy

Published on: May 10, 2014

11.3K

A robust likelihood approach to inference about the kappa coefficient for correlated binary data.

Tsung-Shan Tsou1

  • 1Institute of Statistics, National Central University, Taiwan.

Statistical Methods in Medical Research
|January 17, 2018
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a robust likelihood method for analyzing agreement kappa in correlated data, enabling statistical tests without needing to know specific data distributions for clustered scenarios.

Keywords:
Kappa coefficientclustered datamodel misspecificationmultinomial distributionrobust likelihood

More Related Videos

A Data-Driven Approach to Quantifying Immune States in Sepsis
07:42

A Data-Driven Approach to Quantifying Immune States in Sepsis

Published on: February 7, 2025

553
Artificial Intelligence Approaches to Assessing Primary Cilia
08:58

Artificial Intelligence Approaches to Assessing Primary Cilia

Published on: May 1, 2021

4.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 15, 2026

Easy Measurement of Diffusion Coefficients of EGFP-tagged Plasma Membrane Proteins Using k-Space Image Correlation Spectroscopy
11:43

Easy Measurement of Diffusion Coefficients of EGFP-tagged Plasma Membrane Proteins Using k-Space Image Correlation Spectroscopy

Published on: May 10, 2014

11.3K
A Data-Driven Approach to Quantifying Immune States in Sepsis
07:42

A Data-Driven Approach to Quantifying Immune States in Sepsis

Published on: February 7, 2025

553
Artificial Intelligence Approaches to Assessing Primary Cilia
08:58

Artificial Intelligence Approaches to Assessing Primary Cilia

Published on: May 1, 2021

4.2K

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Biostatistics
  • Data Analysis

Background:

  • The agreement kappa coefficient is crucial for assessing inter-rater reliability, especially with correlated data.
  • Traditional methods often require specific distributional assumptions or detailed modeling of all correlation levels, limiting their applicability.
  • A need exists for flexible statistical tools that can handle clustered and correlated data without stringent assumptions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a robust likelihood function for the agreement kappa coefficient applicable to correlated data.
  • To enable standard statistical inference tools, such as likelihood ratio and score tests, without requiring knowledge of underlying data distributions.
  • To provide a parametric robust likelihood approach suitable for general clustered data scenarios.

Main Methods:

  • Construction of a legitimate likelihood function for the agreement kappa coefficient.
  • Development of a parametric robust likelihood approach.
  • Application to general clustered data scenarios, bypassing the need to model all correlation levels.

Main Results:

  • The proposed method provides a valid likelihood function for agreement kappa with correlated data.
  • It facilitates the use of likelihood ratio tests and score tests, irrespective of the underlying data distributions.
  • Simulations and real data analyses confirm the advantages of this robust procedure for clustered data.

Conclusions:

  • The parametric robust likelihood approach offers a powerful and flexible tool for analyzing agreement in correlated and clustered data.
  • This method enhances statistical inference by removing the dependency on specific distributional assumptions.
  • The demonstrated advantages in simulations and real-world applications highlight its practical utility in various scientific fields.