An Evolutionary/Biochemical Connection between Promoter- and Primer-Dependent Polymerases Revealed by Systematic...

DNA polymerases (DNAPs) recognize 3' recessed termini on duplex DNA and carry out nucleotide catalysis. Unlike promoter-specific RNA polymerases (RNAPs), no sequence specificity is required for binding or initiation of catalysis. Despite this, previous results indicate that viral reverse transcriptases bind much more tightly to DNA primers that mimic the polypurine tract. In the current report, primer sequences that bind with high affinity to Taq and Klenow polymerases were identified using a modified systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment (SELEX) approach. Two Taq-specific primers that bound ∼10 (Taq1) and over 100 (Taq2) times more stably than controls to Taq were identified. TaqI contained 8 nucleotides (5'-CACTAAAG-3') that matched the phage T3 RNAP "core" promoter. Both primers dramatically outcompeted primers with similar binding thermodynamics in PCRs. Similarly, exonuclease^- Klenow polymerase also selected a high-affinity primer that contained a related core promoter sequence from phage T7 RNAP (5'-ACTATAG-3'). For both Taq and Klenow, even small modifications to the sequence resulted in large losses in binding affinity, suggesting that binding was highly sequence specific. The results are discussed in the context of possible effects on multiprimer (multiplex) PCR assays, molecular information theory, and the evolution of RNAPs and DNAPs.IMPORTANCE This work further demonstrates that primer-dependent DNA polymerases can have strong sequence biases leading to dramatically tighter binding to specific sequences. These may be related to biological function or be a consequence of the structural architecture of the enzyme. New sequence specificity for Taq and Klenow polymerases were uncovered, and among them were sequences that contained the core promoter elements from T3 and T7 phage RNA polymerase promoters. This suggests the intriguing possibility that phage RNA polymerases exploited intrinsic binding affinities of ancestral DNA polymerases to develop their promoters. Conversely, DNA polymerases could have evolved from related RNA polymerases and retained the intrinsic binding preference despite there being no clear function for such a preference in DNA biology.