Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 15, 2026

A Quick Phenotypic Neurological Scoring System for Evaluating Disease Progression in the SOD1-G93A Mouse Model of ALS
Published on: October 6, 2015
Commentary on Leibovich et al.: What next?
Kelly S Mix1, Nora S Newcombe2, Susan C Levine3
1Department of Human Development and Quantitative Methodology,University of Maryland,College Park,MD 20742kmix@umd.edu.
Leibovich et al. prompt a reevaluation of quantitative development. This study proposes three novel research avenues building upon existing knowledge in the field.
Area of Science:
- Quantitative Development Research
- Developmental Psychology
Background:
- Existing research on quantitative development requires re-evaluation.
- A need exists to conceptualize quantitative development in new ways.
Purpose of the Study:
- To propose new research directions in quantitative development.
- To build upon decades of established research in the field.
Main Methods:
- Literature review of quantitative development.
- Synthesis of existing research findings.
- Identification of common ground in developmental research.
Main Results:
- Identified limitations in current conceptualizations of quantitative development.
- Proposed three distinct avenues for future research.
- Highlighted areas of consensus from extensive prior studies.
Conclusions:
- The field must regroup to redefine quantitative development.
- Future research should explore novel conceptualizations.
- Leveraging decades of research provides a strong foundation for new directions.
More Related Videos
09:17Optimizing Extracellular Vesicle Delivery Using a Core-Sheath 3D-Bioprinted Scaffold for Chronic Wound Management
Published on: February 28, 2025
06:29Comparing Objective Conjunctival Hyperemia Grading and the Ocular Surface Disease Index Score in Dry Eye Syndrome During COVID-19
Published on: May 25, 2022