Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Statistical Significance01:50

Statistical Significance

22.3K
Once data is collected from both the experimental and the control groups, a statistical analysis is conducted to find out if there are meaningful differences between the two groups. A statistical analysis determines how likely any difference found is due to chance (and thus not meaningful). In psychology, group differences are considered meaningful, or significant, if the odds that these differences occurred by chance alone are 5 percent or less. Stated another way, if we repeated this...
22.3K
Probability in Statistics01:14

Probability in Statistics

23.6K
Probability is the likelihood of an event occurring. The term event is defined as a collection of results of a procedure. An event is a simple event when an outcome cannot be divided into simpler parts.
An example of a simple event is a coin toss. The result of a coin toss is either a head or a tail. Here, head and tail are two simple events. These two simple events make up the sample space. Further, the probability of an event occurring falls within the range of 0 to 1. The probability of an...
23.6K
Introduction to Statistics01:17

Introduction to Statistics

65.1K
The science of statistics involves collecting, analyzing, interpreting, and presenting data. The method of collecting, organizing, and summarizing data is called descriptive statistics. The systematic method of drawing inferences from the sample data and predicting unknown characteristics of a population is called inferential statistics.
In statistics, the collection of individuals or objects under study is called population. The idea of sampling is to select a portion of the larger population...
65.1K
Statistical Analysis: Overview01:11

Statistical Analysis: Overview

16.6K
When we take repeated measurements on the same or replicated samples, we will observe inconsistencies in the magnitude. These inconsistencies are called errors. To categorize and characterize these results and their errors, the researcher can use statistical analysis to determine the quality of the measurements and/or suitability of the methods.
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
16.6K
Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test01:14

Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test

3.9K
The F-test is used to compare two sample variances to each other or compare the sample variance to the population variance. It is used to decide whether an indeterminate error can explain the difference in their values. The underlying assumptions that allow the use of the F-test include the data set or sets are normally distributed, and the data sets are independent of each other. The test statistic F is calculated by dividing one variance by another. In other words, the square of one standard...
3.9K
Introduction to Nonparametric Statistics01:28

Introduction to Nonparametric Statistics

1.4K
Nonparametric statistics offer a powerful alternative to traditional parametric methods, useful when assumptions about the population distribution cannot be made. Unlike parametric tests, which require data to follow a specific distribution with well-defined parameters (such as the mean and standard deviation), nonparametric tests do not require such constraints. This makes them particularly valuable when dealing with small sample sizes, skewed data, or ordinal and categorical variables.
One of...
1.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

You can't fight in here! This is BBS!

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same author

Dependency syntax as the simplest theory of grammar.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same author

A Suite of LMs Comprehend Puzzle Statements as Well or Better Than Humans.

Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science·2026
Same author

Cross-cultural structures of personal name systems reflect general communicative principles.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Three distinct components of pragmatic language use: Social conventions, intonation, and world knowledge-based causal reasoning.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same author

Linguistic structure from a bottleneck on sequential information processing.

Nature human behaviour·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 15, 2026

Tractable Mammalian Cell Infections with Protozoan-primed Bacteria
13:54

Tractable Mammalian Cell Infections with Protozoan-primed Bacteria

Published on: April 2, 2013

10.9K

Structural priming is most useful when the conclusions are statistically robust.

Kyle Mahowald1, Ariel James2, Richard Futrell1

  • 1Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences,Massachusetts Institute of Technology,Cambridge,MA 02139.kmahowald@gmail.comfutrell@mit.eduegibson@mit.edu.

The Behavioral and Brain Sciences
|January 19, 2018
PubMed
Summary

Structural priming is a useful linguistic phenomenon, but its effects may not be powerful enough to replace traditional acceptability judgments in testing detailed syntactic theories, according to this analysis.

More Related Videos

Primed Mycobacterial Uveitis PMU as a Model for Post-Infectious Uveitis
10:33

Primed Mycobacterial Uveitis PMU as a Model for Post-Infectious Uveitis

Published on: December 17, 2021

3.2K
Statistical Modelling of Cortical Connectivity Using Non-invasive Electroencephalograms
08:51

Statistical Modelling of Cortical Connectivity Using Non-invasive Electroencephalograms

Published on: November 1, 2019

6.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 15, 2026

Tractable Mammalian Cell Infections with Protozoan-primed Bacteria
13:54

Tractable Mammalian Cell Infections with Protozoan-primed Bacteria

Published on: April 2, 2013

10.9K
Primed Mycobacterial Uveitis PMU as a Model for Post-Infectious Uveitis
10:33

Primed Mycobacterial Uveitis PMU as a Model for Post-Infectious Uveitis

Published on: December 17, 2021

3.2K
Statistical Modelling of Cortical Connectivity Using Non-invasive Electroencephalograms
08:51

Statistical Modelling of Cortical Connectivity Using Non-invasive Electroencephalograms

Published on: November 1, 2019

6.1K

Area of Science:

  • Psycholinguistics
  • Syntactic Theory
  • Experimental Semantics

Background:

  • Structural priming is a psycholinguistic phenomenon where exposure to a particular linguistic structure increases the likelihood of using that same structure.
  • Branigan & Pickering (B&P) have proposed that structural priming should supersede acceptability judgments in syntactic theory research.
  • Acceptability judgments, while widely used, are debated for their reliability and theoretical grounding.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the efficacy of structural priming as a primary method for testing detailed syntactic theories.
  • To critically assess the claim that structural priming can replace acceptability judgments.
  • To determine the limitations of structural priming in probing fine-grained syntactic phenomena.

Main Methods:

  • The study reviews existing literature on structural priming and its application in syntactic research.
  • It analyzes the statistical power and scope of structural priming effects.
  • Comparison of the evidential strength of structural priming versus acceptability judgments is discussed.

Main Results:

  • Structural priming is acknowledged as an interesting and valuable phenomenon in psycholinguistics.
  • However, the magnitude and specificity of priming effects are questioned regarding their ability to test detailed syntactic claims.
  • The current evidence suggests priming effects may not be robust enough for certain theoretical distinctions.

Conclusions:

  • While structural priming offers insights, it is unlikely to completely replace acceptability judgments for all theoretical testing.
  • Further research is needed to ascertain the precise limits and capabilities of structural priming in syntactic theory.
  • A balanced approach, potentially integrating multiple methodologies, may be most effective for advancing syntactic research.