The "appropriate" response to deprivation: Evolutionary and ethical dimensions
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 16, 2026

Studying Food Reward and Motivation in Humans
Published on: March 19, 2014
Christopher Lewis1, David M G Lewis2
1Stanford Law School and Department of Philosophy,Stanford University,Stanford,CA 94305.cpkl@stanford.eduwww.christopherlewis.org.
Abstract:
Pepper & Nettle use an evolutionary framework to argue that "temporal discounting" is an appropriate response to low socioeconomic status (SES), or deprivation. We suggest some conceptual refinements to their "appropriate-response" perspective, with the hope that it usefully informs future research on and public policy responses to the relationship between deprivation and temporal discounting.
More Related Videos
06:42Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
Published on: September 28, 2018
08:24The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Egoism and Altruism
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Ethical Dilemmas I
Let us explore some examples to understand the potentially complex moral decisions nurses face.
Take the case of caring for minors, particularly in areas related to reproductive...
Ethical Dilemmas II
Evolutionary Psychology
Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective
Evolutionary psychology provides one explanation for these findings, suggesting...