Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 15, 2026

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
Published on: April 19, 2024
Point-Counterpoint: Meningitis/Encephalitis Syndromic Testing in the Clinical Laboratory
Jennifer Dien Bard1,2, Kevin Alby3,4
1Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA jdienbard@chla.usc.edu kevin.alby@uphs.upenn.edu.
Multiplex syndromic panels offer rapid detection of multiple pathogens, but their cost and potential for false results necessitate careful consideration of laboratory implementation strategies. Debates continue on unrestricted versus restricted use for optimal patient care and resource management.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Microbiology
- Infectious Diseases
- Molecular Diagnostics
Background:
- FDA-cleared syndromic panels for pathogen detection emerged in 2008.
- The FilmArray meningitis/encephalitis panel is a recent advancement, detecting 14 targets within an hour.
- These panels target pathogens causing diverse symptoms within the same organ system.
Purpose of the Study:
- To present a debate on the unrestricted versus restricted use of multiplex syndromic panels in clinical laboratories.
- To discuss the advantages and disadvantages of offering advanced molecular diagnostic assays.
Main Methods:
- The study presents a Point-Counterpoint discussion between two experts.
- One expert advocates for unrestricted offering of syndromic panels.
- The other expert raises concerns regarding their use as first-line tests and suggests limitations.
Main Results:
- Studies report both false-positive and false-negative results with syndromic panels.
- The significant cost of these assays is a shared concern among healthcare systems.
- Healthcare systems employ varied strategies for assay availability, including restricted use or ordering specific PCRs.
Conclusions:
- The debate highlights the need for strategic implementation of syndromic panels.
- Consideration of cost, accuracy, and clinical utility is crucial for laboratory adoption.
- Balancing comprehensive testing with resource management remains a key challenge.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome II: Pathophysiology and Clinical Manifestations
Irritable Bowel Syndrome II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Evaluation
Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) is classified into subtypes based on the predominant bowel habits as determined by the Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS). The subtypes are:
Cranial and Spinal Meninges
Cranial Meninges
These meningeal layers cover the cranium. The dura mater is the outermost layer of cranial meninges. It is a thick and durable membrane of dense...
Myocarditis II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Pericarditis II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Atherosclerosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Tests

