Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Levels of selection and capacity limits.

V J Dark, W A Johnston, M Myles-Worsley

    Journal of Experimental Psychology. General
    |December 1, 1985
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Stage 2 processing and the divided-attention effect.

    Memory & cognition·2013
    Same author

    Perceptual inhibition of expected inputs: The key that opens closed minds.

    Psychonomic bulletin & review·2013
    Same author

    Brain Activity Underlying Mental Imagery: Event-related Potentials During Mental Image Generation.

    Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2013
    Same author

    Savings in relearning face-name associations as evidence for "covert recognition" in prosopagnosia.

    Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2013
    Same author

    Visual Object Representation: Interpreting Neurophysiological Data within a Computational Framework.

    Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2013
    Same author

    Mechanisms of spatial attention: the relation of macrostructure to microstructure in parietal neglect.

    Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2013
    Same journal

    Executive function and social behavior: Causal evidence from loading working memory and inhibitory control.

    Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
    Same journal

    Correction to "Your research is public engagement: A case for more intentional science communication in research with human subjects" by Vaughn (2026).

    Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
    Same journal

    Correction to "Costs and benefits of acting extraverted: A randomized controlled trial" by Jacques-Hamilton et al. (2019).

    Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
    Same journal

    Conveying (discrete) emotionality with novel words.

    Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
    Same journal

    Physical actions shape moral choices: Environment-directed movements reduce cheating in young children.

    Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
    Same journal

    From chunks to schemas: Learning in the Hebb repetition paradigm.

    Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
    See all related articles

    This study on visual processing found that word relevance increases cognitive processing, while display load decreases it. These effects on selective and capacity-limited attention remained consistent across various experimental conditions.

    Area of Science:

    • Cognitive Psychology
    • Experimental Psychology
    • Neuroscience

    Background:

    • Understanding how the brain processes visual information is crucial for cognitive science.
    • Previous research has explored factors influencing selective attention and information processing.
    • The interplay between word relevance and display load in visual tasks requires further investigation.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate the impact of word relevancy and display load on different levels of information processing.
    • To measure physical, semantic, and controlled processing of nontarget words in a visual target-detection task.
    • To assess the priming potency of nontargets using a concurrent word identification task.

    Main Methods:

    • Subjects performed a visual target-detection task across eight experiments.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Manipulated word relevancy (relevant vs. irrelevant location) and display load (1-4 words).
  • Measured identity priming (physical), semantic priming (semantic), and recognition memory (controlled processing).

    • Main Results:

    • All measures of processing (physical, semantic, controlled) increased with word relevancy.
    • All measures of processing decreased as display load increased.
    • Priming effects persisted even with speeded word presentation and reduced controlled processing.

    Conclusions:

    • Cognitive processing at physical, semantic, and controlled levels is selective.
    • These processing levels are capacity-limited, influenced by factors like relevancy and load.
    • The findings contribute to understanding the mechanisms of selective attention in complex visual environments.