Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 15, 2026

07:21
Walk with Me Hybrid Virtual/In-Person Walking for Older Adults with Neurodegenerative Disease
Published on: June 16, 2023
1.6K
How fast does a random walk cover a torus?
1JSC, FZ Jülich, D-52425 Jülich, Germany.
Physical Review. E
|January 20, 2018
Summary
High statistics simulations confirm random walk covering time scaling on a 2D torus. However, the prefactor deviates from theoretical predictions, suggesting slow convergence for lattice walks.
Area of Science:
- Probability theory
- Statistical physics
- Computational mathematics
Background:
- The time for a random walk to visit all sites on a lattice (cover time) is a fundamental problem in probability.
- Previous theoretical work predicted a specific scaling law for the cover time on a 2D torus.
Purpose of the Study:
- To present high statistics simulation data for the cover time of a random walk on a 2D torus.
- To compare simulation results with existing theoretical predictions, particularly the prefactor of the scaling law.
- To investigate the convergence of cover times and reconcile potential discrepancies between theory and simulation.
Main Methods:
- High statistics numerical simulations of random walks on L×L two-dimensional tori.
- Analysis of the average cover time 〈T_{cover}(L)〉 and the time T_{N(t)=1}(L) when only one site remains unvisited.
- Comparison of simulation data with theoretical predictions, including scaling laws and prefactors.
Main Results:
- Simulations confirm the predicted scaling 〈T_{cover}(L)〉∼(LlnL)^{2} for large L.
- A significant deviation in the prefactor from the theoretically predicted 4/π was observed using straightforward extrapolation.
- The scaling law holds for T_{N(t)=1}(L), and the distribution of rescaled cover times sharpens as L→∞.
- Results are reconciled with Dembo et al.'s work by considering a slow, nonmonotonic convergence of the prefactor for lattice walks.
Conclusions:
- The study validates the asymptotic scaling of random walk cover times on a 2D torus.
- Discrepancies in the prefactor highlight the importance of slow convergence effects in lattice models.
- The findings support conjectures about the behavior of cover times for lattice walks, aligning with Brownian motion results.
Related Concept Videos
Random Error
9.9K
Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
9.9K
Random Variables
17.9K
A random variable is a single numerical value that indicates the outcome of a procedure. The concept of random variables is fundamental to the probability theory and was introduced by a Russian mathematician, Pafnuty Chebyshev, in the mid-nineteenth century.
Uppercase letters such as X or Y denote a random variable. Lowercase letters like x or y denote the value of a random variable. If X is a random variable, then X is written in words, and x is given as a number.
For example, let X = the...
Uppercase letters such as X or Y denote a random variable. Lowercase letters like x or y denote the value of a random variable. If X is a random variable, then X is written in words, and x is given as a number.
For example, let X = the...
17.9K
Randomized Experiments
9.1K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
Simple randomization
Simple...
9.1K
Random and Systematic Errors
15.4K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
15.4K
Random Sampling Method
15.1K
Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. Data are the result of sampling from a population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest. Among the various sampling methods used by...
15.1K
Fast Fourier Transform
988
The Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) is a computational algorithm designed to compute the Discrete Fourier Transform (DFT) efficiently. By breaking down the calculations into smaller, manageable sections, the FFT significantly reduces the computational complexity involved. Direct computation of an N-point DFT requires N2 complex multiplications, whereas the FFT algorithm needs only (N/2)log2N multiplications, offering a much faster performance.
The computational efficiency of the FFT becomes...
The computational efficiency of the FFT becomes...
988

