Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 15, 2026

Tissue-Engineered Graft for Circumferential Esophageal Reconstruction in Rats
Published on: February 10, 2020
Esophageal Cancer Surgery: Spontaneous Centralization in the US Contributed to Reduce Mortality Without Causing
Francisco Schlottmann1,2, Paula D Strassle3,4, Anthony G Charles3
1Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 4030 Burnett Womack Building 101 Manning Drive, CB 7081, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7081, USA. fschlottmann@hotmail.com.
Background:
Improvement in mortality has been shown for esophagectomies performed at high-volume centers.
Objective:
This study aimed to determine if centralization of esophageal cancer surgery occurred in the US, and to establish its impact on postoperative mortality. In addition, we aimed to analyze the relationship between regionalization of cancer care and health disparities.
Methods:
A retrospective population-based analysis was performed using the National Inpatient Sample for the period 2000-2014. Adult patients (≥ 18 years of age) diagnosed with esophageal cancer and who underwent esophagectomy were included. Yearly hospital volume was categorized as low (< 5 procedures), intermediate (5-20 procedures), and high (> 20 procedures). Multivariable analyses on the potential effect of hospital volume on patient outcomes were performed, and the yearly rate of esophagectomies was estimated using Poisson regression.
Results:
A total of 5235 patients were included. Esophagectomy at low- [odds ratio (OR) 2.17] and intermediate-volume (OR 1.62) hospitals, compared with high-volume hospitals, was associated with a significant increase in mortality. The percentage of esophagectomies performed at high-volume centers significantly increased during the study period (29.2-68.5%; p < 0.0001). The trend towards high-volume hospitals was different among the different US regions: South (7.7-54.3%), West (15.0-67.6%), Midwest (37.3-67.7%), and Northeast (55.8-86.8%) [p < 0.0001]. Overall, the mortality rate of esophagectomy dropped from 10.0 to 3.5% (p = 0.006), with non-White race, public insurance, and low household income patients also showing a significant reduction in mortality.
Conclusions:
A spontaneous centralization for esophageal cancer surgery occurred in the US. This process was associated with a decrease in the mortality rate, without contributing to health disparities.
More Related Videos
04:58Reduced Procedure Time and Variability with Active Esophageal Cooling During Radiofrequency Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: August 25, 2022
06:25Cooling or Warming the Esophagus to Reduce Esophageal Injury During Left Atrial Ablation in the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: March 15, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Spontaneity
Binet's Contribution to Measures of Intelligence
The Central Dogma
Esophageal Varices-I: Introduction
Measures of Central Tendency
Wechsler's Contribution to Measures of Intelligence