Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 15, 2026

Determining Glucose Metabolism Kinetics Using 18F-FDG Micro-PET/CT
Published on: May 2, 2017
Neoadjuvant chemoradiation for esophageal cancer : Surgery improves locoregional control while response based on
Nina-Sophie Hegemann1, Rebecca Koepple2, Franziska Walter2
1Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Munich (LMU), Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany. Nina-Sophie.Hegemann@med.uni-muenchen.de.
Introduction:
To retrospectively analyze the outcome of patients with esophageal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation.
Methods:
A total of 41 patients received neoadjuvant intent chemoradiation for esophageal cancer. Most patients had a locally advanced disease (T3/4: 82%, N+: 83%, M0: 100%) and squamous cell carcinoma (83%). All patients received concurrent chemotherapy with cisplatin/5-fluorouracil or mitomycin/5-fluorouracil. Median radiation dose was 50.4 Gy in the 25 patients who proceeded to surgery and 57.4 Gy in 16 patients who did not undergo surgery. FDG-PET/CT was used for treatment planning in 24 patients. A second FDG-PET/CT was available for response evaluation in 18 patients.
Results:
Median follow-up was 16 months in all patients and 30 months in survivors. Radiotherapy was completed without interruptions >3 days in 90% of patients, and chemotherapy was carried out to >80% in 85% of patients. The 2‑year locoregional control rate was 60%, distant control rate 54% and overall survival rate 50%. Hematological toxicity grade 3/4 was observed in 34%/10% of patients and non-hematological toxicity grade 3/4 in 46%/2% of patients. Perioperative 30-day mortality was 4%. Subgroup analyses revealed that surgery significantly improved locoregional control (74% vs. 39%, p = 0.034), but not the 2‑year survival rate (54% vs. 43%, p = 0.246). In contrast, response based on FDG-PET/CT prior and after chemoradiation significantly predicted improved overall survival (2-year overall survival 61% vs. 40%, p = 0.048).
Conclusion:
Outcomes of our cohort were comparable to other series using similar treatments. Surgery significantly improved locoregional control but not survival. Response based on FDG-PET/CT predicted survival and might be used for treatment stratification.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
Predicting Molecular Geometry
Esophageal Varices-I: Introduction
Survival Curves
The Kaplan-Meier estimator is the most common method for constructing survival curves. This...
Survival Tree
Building a Survival Tree
Constructing a...
Esophageal Perforation-I: Introduction
The location of esophageal perforation can vary, occurring anywhere along the esophagus....

