Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 15, 2026

A Protocol to Set Up Needle-Free Connector with Positive Displacement on Central Venous Catheter in Intensive Care Unit
Published on: July 13, 2019
Closing the Loop on Centralization of Cleft Care in the United Kingdom
Andrew R Ness1,2, Andrew R Wills2, Andrea Waylen2
11 Biomedical Research Unit in Nutrition, Diet and Lifestyle, National Institute for Health Research, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Insights
Centralized cleft care in the UK has significantly improved outcomes for children with cleft lip and palate, particularly in speech and dental arch development. This study supports the continued use of centralized treatment models.
Area of Science:
- Craniofacial surgery
- Pediatric health outcomes
- Public health policy
Background:
- The reconfiguration of cleft care services in the United Kingdom involved centralization.
- Assessing the long-term impact of this centralization is crucial for understanding treatment effectiveness.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the outcomes for children with nonsyndromic unilateral cleft lip and palate 15 years after the centralization of cleft care in the UK.
- To evaluate the impact of centralized cleft care on various clinical measures.
Main Methods:
- Audit clinics were conducted in UK Cleft Centers.
- Data were collected from 268 five-year-old children born between 2005 and 2007 with nonsyndromic unilateral cleft lip and palate.
- Routine clinical measures included speech, hearing, dental health, and psychosocial factors, mirroring a previous survey.
Main Results:
- Overall outcomes were improved following centralization.
- Significant advancements were observed in dentoalveolar arch relationships and speech.
- The prevalence of dental caries and hearing loss remained unchanged.
Conclusions:
- Centralized cleft care has demonstrably improved patient outcomes in the UK.
- The findings strongly advocate for maintaining the centralized model of cleft care delivery.
Objective:
We highlight a major study that investigated the impact of reconfigured cleft care in the United Kingdom some 15 years after centralization. We argue that centralization as an intervention has a major impact on outcomes.
Setting:
Audit clinics held in Cleft Centers in the United Kingdom.
Patients, Participants:
Five-year-olds born between April 1, 2005, and March 31, 2007, with nonsyndromic unilateral cleft lip and palate.
Interventions:
Centralization of cleft care.
Main Outcome Measure(S):
We collected routine clinical measures (speech recordings, hearing, photographs, models, oral health, psychosocial factors) in a very similar way to a previous survey.
Results:
We identified 359 eligible children and recruited 268 (74.7%) to the study. Overall, their outcomes were better post-centralization. There have been marked improvements in dentoalveolar arch relationships and in speech whereas the prevalence of dental caries and hearing loss are unchanged.
Conclusions:
Centralized cleft care has changed UK outcomes considerably and there is no argument for returning to a dispersed model of treatment.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Open and closed-loop control systems
An open-loop control system operates without feedback from the output. It consists of two primary elements: the controller and the controlled process. The controller receives an input signal...
The Central Dogma
Measurement: Standard Units
Measurement: Derived Units
Measures of Central Tendency
Units of Measurement
There are various well-known historical measurement systems, such as the Babylonian system, the Roman system, the Egyptian system, the Olympian system, the British system, and the Indus...

