A Critical Review of the Consensus Statement from the European Atherosclerosis Society Consensus Panel 2017
Harumi Okuyama1, Tomohito Hamazaki2, Rokuro Hama3
1Nagoya City University, and Institute for Consumer Science and Human Life, Kinjo, Gakuin University, Nagoya, Japan.
Insights
The European Atherosclerosis Society
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Research and Atherosclerosis
Background:
- The 2017 European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) Consensus Statement posits that low-density lipoprotein (LDL) directly causes atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD).
- This conclusion is based on Mendelian randomization, prospective cohort studies, and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) demonstrating a link between LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and ASCVD risk.
- The EAS Statement suggests that reducing LDL concentration proportionally lowers ASCVD risk based on exposure magnitude and duration.
Purpose of the Study:
- To critically re-evaluate the interpretations of studies used in the 2017 EAS Consensus Statement.
- To challenge the conclusion that LDL solely causes ASCVD and question the justification for widespread statin use.
- To highlight alternative interpretations of existing data and introduce new findings regarding atherosclerosis causation.
Main Methods:
- Review and re-interpretation of Mendelian randomization studies concerning LDL receptor function.
- Analysis of prospective cohort studies, addressing disregarded inconsistent reports and differentiating genetic factors.
- Critical examination of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of statins, considering regulatory changes and adverse effects.
Main Results:
- Alternative interpretations of Mendelian randomization studies suggest different conclusions regarding LDL-C and ASCVD.
- Inconsistent findings in prospective cohort studies were overlooked; genetic factors require separate analysis, and ASCVD is inappropriately generalized.
- Meta-analyses of RCTs should differentiate pre- and post-2004/2005 data due to significant changes in statin efficacy and the need for rigorous evaluation of irreversible adverse effects.
Conclusions:
- The EAS conclusion that LDL causes ASCVD is contested based on re-evaluation of evidence.
- Atherosclerosis may be caused by statins, warfarin, and certain dietary fats, independent of elevated LDL-C levels.
- The promotion of statin treatment is considered risky, and its conclusions for ASCVD prevention are not fully justified.
Background:
The Consensus Statement from the European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) Consensus Panel 2017 concludes on the basis of 3 different types of clinical studies that low-density lipoprotein (LDL) causes atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). In Mendelian randomization studies, rare genetic mutations affecting LDL receptor function were found to cause higher or lower LDL-C levels, which are associated with correspondingly altered ASCVD risk. In prospective cohort studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of statins, a remarkably consistent log-linear association was demonstrated between the absolute magnitude of LDL-C exposure and ASCVD risk. The EAS Statement proposes that any mechanism of lowering plasma LDL concentration should reduce the risk of ASCVD events proportional to the absolute reduction in LDL-C and the cumulative duration of exposure to lower LDL-C. However, as we explain, we do not find this conclusion acceptable.
Summary:
Our review points out that different interpretations are possible for the results of Mendelian randomization studies. As for prospective cohort studies, many inconsistent reports on the association of LDL-C and ASCVD were disregarded when drafting the Statement, reports with and without genetic factors related to LDL receptor function should be analyzed separately, and the term ASCVD in the Statement is used inappropriately because myocardial infarction and cerebral infarction differ in their association with LDL-C. As for RCTs, clinical reports on statins published before and after the implementation of new regulations affecting clinical trials (2004/2005) should not both be included in meta-analyses because the evaluated efficacy of statins changed markedly, and the irreversible adverse effects of statins need to be evaluated more rigorously now that their mechanisms have been elucidated. Key Messages: Apart from the EAS hypothesis that LDL causes ASCVD, recent pharmacological/biochemical studies, as summarized in this review and elsewhere, have revealed that atherosclerosis is caused by statins taken to lower LDL-C, as well as by warfarin and some types of vegetable fats and oils, in the absence of significantly elevated LDL-C levels. Thus, the promotion of statin treatment by the Statement is rather risky and we do not feel that the conclusions are justified for the prevention of ASCVD.
Related Concept Videos
Wood Panel Products
Review and Preview
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
Review and Preview
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Atherosclerosis I: Introduction
Critical Region, Critical Values and Significance Level
In hypothesis testing, a sample statistic is converted to a test statistic using z, t, or chi-square distribution. A critical region is an area under the curve in probability distributions demarcated by the critical value. When the test statistic falls in this region, it suggests that the null hypothesis must be rejected. As this region contains all those values of the...


