Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 6, 2026

Universal Screening for Prevention of Reading, Writing, and Math Disabilities in Spanish
Published on: July 18, 2020
Validation of intellectual disability coding through hospital morbidity records using an intellectual disability
Jenny Bourke1, Kingsley Wong1, Helen Leonard1
1Department of Epidemiology, Telethon Kids Institute, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
Insights
Hospital morbidity data is unreliable for identifying intellectual disability (ID). Researchers should use population-based data sources for accurate ascertainment in epidemiological studies.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Epidemiology
- Disability Studies
Background:
- Accurate ascertainment of intellectual disability (ID) is crucial for epidemiological research and service planning.
- Hospital morbidity data systems are often used for health surveillance but their utility for specific conditions like ID requires validation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of the Western Australian Hospital Morbidity Data System (HMDS) in identifying individuals with intellectual disability (ID) compared to a dedicated population-based database.
Main Methods:
- A cohort of children born between 1983-2010 with hospital admissions in HMDS was linked with the Western Australian Intellectual Disability Exploring Answers (IDEA) database.
- International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes indicative of ID were identified within HMDS.
Main Results:
- Out of 488,905 individuals, 10,218 had ID. Only 14.7% of ID cases were identified through HMDS, with 4.7% unique to HMDS.
- Cases unique to HMDS were often deceased infants, and those identified in HMDS were more likely to be younger, female, non-Aboriginal, and have severe ID.
- HMDS demonstrated high specificity (99.9%) but low sensitivity (14.7%) for ID ascertainment.
Conclusions:
- Hospital morbidity data alone is not a reliable source for identifying intellectual disability in population-based studies.
- Epidemiological researchers must consider the limitations of hospital data and utilize more comprehensive sources for accurate ID ascertainment.
Objectives:
To investigate how well intellectual disability (ID) can be ascertained using hospital morbidity data compared with a population-based data source.
Design, Setting And Participants:
All children born in 1983-2010 with a hospital admission in the Western Australian Hospital Morbidity Data System (HMDS) were linked with the Western Australian Intellectual Disability Exploring Answers (IDEA) database. The International Classification of Diseases hospital codes consistent with ID were also identified.
Main Outcome Measures:
The characteristics of those children identified with ID through either or both sources were investigated.
Results:
Of the 488 905 individuals in the study, 10 218 (2.1%) were identified with ID in either IDEA or HMDS with 1435 (14.0%) individuals identified in both databases, 8305 (81.3%) unique to the IDEA database and 478 (4.7%) unique to the HMDS dataset only. Of those unique to the HMDS dataset, about a quarter (n=124) had died before 1 year of age and most of these (75%) before 1 month. Children with ID who were also coded as such in the HMDS data were more likely to be aged under 1 year, female, non-Aboriginal and have a severe level of ID, compared with those not coded in the HMDS data. The sensitivity of using HMDS to identify ID was 14.7%, whereas the specificity was much higher at 99.9%.
Conclusion:
Hospital morbidity data are not a reliable source for identifying ID within a population, and epidemiological researchers need to take these findings into account in their study design.
Related Concept Videos
Learning Disabilities
Dyslexia
Dyslexia is a...
Intellectual Disability
Hospitals-II
Nurses that work in...
Hospitals-I
lncRNA - Long Non-coding RNAs
What is Population Genetics?

