Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 19, 2026

A New Single Chamber Implantable Defibrillator with Atrial Sensing: A Practical Demonstration of Sensing and Ease of Implantation
Published on: February 28, 2012
Putting the "Informed" in the informed consent process for implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: Addressing the
Arnold R Eiser1,2, James N Kirkpatrick3, Kristen K Patton3
1Department of Medicine, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Insights
Informed consent for implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) is complex for elderly patients. Discussions should include future deactivation or nonreplacement options to align with patient values and changing conditions.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Ethics
- Geriatric Medicine
Background:
- Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) present complex management challenges, particularly for multimorbid elderly patients undergoing primary prevention.
- Fully informed consent for ICD implantation is difficult to achieve, especially considering potential future deactivation or nonreplacement needs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To address the complexities of informed consent for ICDs in elderly patients.
- To emphasize the importance of discussing future device deactivation or nonreplacement at the time of initial implant and at follow-up intervals.
Main Methods:
- Review of Heart Rhythm Society recommendations regarding ICD consent.
- Analysis of challenges in decision-making capacity for elderly patients and the role of surrogate decision-makers.
- Exploration of the utility of information and decision aids to enhance patient understanding.
Main Results:
- Current consent procedures may not adequately prepare patients for future decisions regarding ICD deactivation or nonreplacement.
- Elderly patients may lack the capacity or will to make complex decisions when their clinical condition changes.
- Information and decision aids can improve understanding and facilitate value-consistent choices.
Conclusions:
- Informed consent for ICDs requires proactive discussion of potential future deactivation or nonreplacement, especially for elderly patients.
- Integrating discussions about changing clinical conditions and device utility into the initial consent process is crucial.
- Enhanced communication and decision support empower patients and surrogates to make treatment decisions aligned with personal values.
Abstract:
Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) management complexities challenge the ethos of fully informed consent, particularly for the typically multimorbid elderly patient considering the device for primary prevention. The Heart Rhythm Society recommends providers include discussion on the potential need for later device deactivation or nonreplacement at the time of first implant, and to revisit this at appropriate intervals. The initial consent procedure could meet this standard by incorporating the future need to discuss further such issues when the recipient's clinical condition changes to such an extent that defibrillation would no longer be beneficial. At the time of obtaining consent, some patients may lack the will or capacity to make medically complex decisions when it would be necessary for healthcare surrogate decision-makers to contribute to this process. Ensuring an appropriate level of understanding and response may be enhanced by the use of information and decision aids. With improved communication regarding the nuances of ICD therapy, device eligible patients, and those close to them, will be empowered with a better understanding of the nature, benefits, and risks of ICD implantation, allowing them to make treatment decisions consistent with their values.
Related Concept Videos
Drug Dosing: Geriatric Patients
Pharmacodynamics in Geriatric Patients: Effects of Age
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Cardiac Catheterization IV: Nursing Management
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy VI: Nursing Management

