Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Trait and State Self-Esteem02:08

Trait and State Self-Esteem

11.5K
The term self-esteem is often used generically, to refer to how people feel about themselves. However, according to research, there are three distinct constructs that should not be used interchangeably (Brown & Marshall, 2006). 
11.5K
Polygenic Traits01:18

Polygenic Traits

69.2K
When more than one gene is responsible for a given phenotype, the trait is considered polygenic. Human height is a polygenic trait. Studies have uncovered hundreds of loci that influence height, and there are believed to be many more. Due to the high number of genes involved, as well as environmental and nutritional factors, height varies significantly within a given population. The distribution of height forms a bell-shaped curve, with relatively few individuals in the population at the...
69.2K
The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison02:57

The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison

56.2K
According to Charles Cooley, we base our image on what we think other people see (Cooley 1902). We imagine how we must appear to others, then react to this speculation. We don certain clothes, prepare our hair in a particular manner, wear makeup, use cologne, and the like—all with the notion that our presentation of ourselves is going to affect how others perceive us. We expect a certain reaction, and, if lucky, we get the one we desire and feel good about it. But more than that, Cooley...
56.2K
Multiple Allele Traits01:49

Multiple Allele Traits

38.3K
The Concept of Multiple Allelism
38.3K
Social Proof00:52

Social Proof

32.4K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
32.4K
Traits and States01:17

Traits and States

569
Personality traits represent consistent patterns in behavior, thoughts, and emotions, reflecting an individual's tendencies across various situations. For example, extraversion, a well-known trait, manifests in individuals as talkative, energetic, and enthusiastic behaviors. These traits are stable over time, offering a reliable framework for predicting how people might act in different contexts. However, they do not define every moment of an individual's life. In contrast to traits,...
569

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A taxonomy of discriminatory behavior.

Psychological review·2026
Same author

The environment impressions model.

Journal of personality and social psychology·2026
Same author

Racial stereotypes bias the neural representation of objects towards perceived weapons.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

A high-dimensional model of social impressions.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2025
Same author

Cognitive underpinnings and ecological correlates of implicit bias against non-Americans in the United States.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

In order to count, lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex, and asexual people must be counted.

Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 15, 2026

Conditions Affecting Social Space in Drosophila melanogaster
08:04

Conditions Affecting Social Space in Drosophila melanogaster

Published on: November 5, 2015

12.9K

A Dynamic Structure of Social Trait Space.

Ryan M Stolier1, Eric Hehman2, Jonathan B Freeman1

  • 1New York University, New York, NY, USA.

Trends in Cognitive Sciences
|January 26, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Facial impressions of personality are not fixed, but dynamic. Context and social factors influence how we perceive traits from faces, creating a shifting impression space.

Keywords:
dimensional modelsface evaluationperson perceptionrepresentational similarity analysissocial cognition

More Related Videos

A System for Tracking the Dynamics of Social Preference Behavior in Small Rodents
08:38

A System for Tracking the Dynamics of Social Preference Behavior in Small Rodents

Published on: November 21, 2019

8.2K
Correlative Microscopy for 3D Structural Analysis of Dynamic Interactions
13:43

Correlative Microscopy for 3D Structural Analysis of Dynamic Interactions

Published on: June 24, 2013

14.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 15, 2026

Conditions Affecting Social Space in Drosophila melanogaster
08:04

Conditions Affecting Social Space in Drosophila melanogaster

Published on: November 5, 2015

12.9K
A System for Tracking the Dynamics of Social Preference Behavior in Small Rodents
08:38

A System for Tracking the Dynamics of Social Preference Behavior in Small Rodents

Published on: November 21, 2019

8.2K
Correlative Microscopy for 3D Structural Analysis of Dynamic Interactions
13:43

Correlative Microscopy for 3D Structural Analysis of Dynamic Interactions

Published on: June 24, 2013

14.6K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Facial appearance strongly influences personality trait impressions.
  • Existing research indicates these impressions are context-dependent and affected by social cognition.
  • The nature of the trait space derived from facial cues is debated.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a novel framework for understanding facial trait impressions.
  • To highlight the dynamic nature of the trait space influenced by context.
  • To integrate bottom-up and top-down processing in impression formation.

Main Methods:

  • Theoretical framework development.
  • Review of existing literature on face perception and social cognition.
  • Conceptual integration of perceptual and cognitive factors.

Main Results:

  • A novel framework is proposed where trait impressions are not static.
  • Multiple interacting processes (bottom-up and top-down) shape a dynamic trait space.
  • Context and social cognitive factors are key modulators of facial impressions.

Conclusions:

  • Facial trait impression formation is a dynamic process.
  • The trait space is malleable, influenced by interplay of various cognitive mechanisms.
  • Future research should explore these dynamic interactions empirically.