Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 15, 2026

Integration of Bioinformatics Approaches and Experimental Validations to Understand the Role of Notch Signaling in Ovarian Cancer
Published on: January 12, 2020
Reliability and validity of SF-12v2 among adults with self-reported cancer
Naleen Raj Bhandari1, Niranjan Kathe1, Corey Hayes2
1Division of Pharmaceutical Evaluation and Policy, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Background:
The SF-12v2 has been validated in general population and other conditions but the evidence is limited in Americans with cancer.
Objective:
To assess reliability and validity of SF-12v2 among adults with self-reported cancer using the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS).
Methods:
Self-reported cancer participants (SCPs) were identified from 2003 MEPS. SF-12v2 was administered as part of self-administered questionnaires. Physical (PCS12) and mental (MCS12) component scores of SF-12v2 were evaluated for reliability (internal consistency, test-retest) and validity (convergent, discriminant, predictive, concurrent).
Results:
420 SCPs were identified with average age of 59.3 years (SE = 0.9). 10.7% had multiple cancers (>1) and 52% had at least one other chronic condition (OCC). Average PCS12 and MCS12 were 45.09 (SE = 0.5) and 50.75 (SE = 0.5). PCS12 and MCS12 demonstrated high internal consistency (αPCS12 = 0.89; αMCS12 = 0.88), acceptable test-retest reliability (ICCPCS12 = 0.82; ICCMCS12 = 0.73), strongly correlated with most of the expected EQ-5D domains (r = 0.51-0.71), and demonstrated strong convergent validity on perceived health (r = 0.61) and perceived mental health (r = 0.52). PCS12 and MCS12 were able to discriminate between groups with and without physical/cognitive limitations. Only PCS12 was negatively correlated with number of OCCs.
Conclusion:
The SF-12v2 is a reliable and valid instrument to quantify health-related quality of life among adults with self-reported cancer.
Related Concept Videos
Reliability and Validity
Distribution Reliability and Automation
Data Validation
Key parameters for method validation include:
Data Validation
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
Data Reporting and Recording
Types of Reports I: Hands-off Report
Following are the key components and categories of hand-off reports:
Purpose and Process:

